Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145191›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2016

Knowing What We're Doing: Why Specification of Treatment Methods Is Critical for Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology.

Lyn S Turkstra, Rocío Norman, John Whyte, Marcel P Dijkers, Tessa Hart

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05091970 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion: STAR-C

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouth Texas Veterans Health Care SystemRan2021 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsMild Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsManualized cognitive rehabilitation for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
NCT06855186 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion (STAR-C): RCT of In-person vs Telehealth vs Wait List Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2025 to 2028Enrolled222ConditionsMild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)ArmsSymptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Paediatric oral sensorimotor interventions for chewing dysfunction: A scoping review.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2021
    Article
  13. Is There a Research-Practice Dosage Gap in Aphasia Rehabilitation?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lyn S Turkstra
Rocío Norman
John Whyte
Marcel P Dijkers
Tessa Hart

Funding

Social perception and social communication in adults with traumatic brain injuryR01HD071089 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DUFF, MELISSA C, MUTLU, BILGE D · 2012 to 2022
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this clinical focus article is to describe the conceptual framework of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment taxonomy (RTT) and illustrate its potential use in speech-language pathology (SLP) clinical practice and research.

methodThe method used was a critical discussion.

resultsCurrent methods of defining and classifying SLP and other rehabilitation interventions maintain the "black box" of rehabilitation by referring to hours or days of therapy or using problem-oriented labels (e.g., naming treatment) to describe treatments, none of which reveal what is actually done to effect desired changes in patient functioning. The RTT framework uses treatment targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action defined by treatment theory to specify SLP and other rehabilitation interventions with greater precision than current methods of treatment labeling and classification. It also makes a distinction between the target of treatment at which ingredients are directed and broader aims of treatment, which may be downstream effects explained instead by enablement/disablement theory.

conclusionFuture application of the RTT conceptual scheme to SLP intervention may enhance clinical practice, research, and knowledge translation as well as training and program evaluation efforts.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeSpeech-Language PathologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID27145191
PMCPMC6195039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.