Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27144306›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Versatile Bioreactor for Dynamic Suspension Cell Culture. Application to the Culture of Cancer Cell Spheroids.

Diana Massai, Giuseppe Isu, Denise Madeddu, Giulia Cerino, Angela Falco, Caterina Frati, Diego Gallo, Marco A Deriu, Giuseppe Falvo D'Urso Labate, Federico Quaini and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Diana MassaiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe IsuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Denise MadedduDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giulia CerinoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Angela FalcoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Caterina FratiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Diego GalloDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Marco A DeriuIstituto Dalle Molle di studi sull'Intelligenza Artificiale, Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana, Università della Svizzera italiana, Manno, Switzerland.
Giuseppe Falvo D'Urso LabateBioexpansys Srl, Turin, Italy.
Federico QuainiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Alberto AudeninoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Umberto MorbiducciDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A versatile bioreactor suitable for dynamic suspension cell culture under tunable shear stress conditions has been developed and preliminarily tested culturing cancer cell spheroids. By adopting simple technological solutions and avoiding rotating components, the bioreactor exploits the laminar hydrodynamics establishing within the culture chamber enabling dynamic cell suspension in an environment favourable to mass transport, under a wide range of tunable shear stress conditions. The design phase of the device has been supported by multiphysics modelling and has provided a comprehensive analysis of the operating principles of the bioreactor. Moreover, an explanatory example is herein presented with multiphysics simulations used to set the proper bioreactor operating conditions for preliminary in vitro biological tests on a human lung carcinoma cell line. The biological results demonstrate that the ultralow shear dynamic suspension provided by the device is beneficial for culturing cancer cell spheroids. In comparison to the static suspension control, dynamic cell suspension preserves morphological features, promotes intercellular connection, increases spheroid size (2.4-fold increase) and number of cycling cells (1.58-fold increase), and reduces double strand DNA damage (1.5-fold reduction). It is envisioned that the versatility of this bioreactor could allow investigation and expansion of different cell types in the future.

Indexed as

BioreactorsBiophysical PhenomenaCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationEquipment DesignHumansHydrodynamicsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, BiologicalSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID27144306
PMCPMC4856383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.