Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27144159›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2016

Utilizing Autologous Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold in Human Bone Defects: A Prospective, Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Pavel Šponer, Stanislav Filip, Tomáš Kučera, Jindra Brtková, Karel Urban, Vladimír Palička, Zuzana Kočí, Michael Syka, Aleš Bezrouk, Eva Syková

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Review
  13. AnStem cells international · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Innovative Biomaterials for Bone Regrowth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pavel ŠponerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Šimkova 870, 500 38 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Stanislav FilipDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Šimkova 870, 500 38 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8567-0745
Tomáš KučeraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jindra BrtkováDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Karel UrbanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Vladimír PaličkaInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Šimkova 870, 500 38 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Zuzana KočíInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neuroscience, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michael SykaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic.
Aleš BezroukDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Šimkova 870, 500 38 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-3847
Eva SykováInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neuroscience, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective controlled study was to compare healing quality following the implantation of ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate, containing either expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (trial group, 9 patients) or β-tricalcium phosphate alone (control group, 9 patients), into femoral defects during revision total hip arthroplasty. Both groups were assessed using the Harris Hip Score, radiography, and DEXA scanning at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A significant difference in the bone defect healing was observed between both groups of patients (P < 0.05). In the trial group, trabecular remodeling was found in all nine patients and in the control group, in 1 patient only. Whereas, over the 12-month follow-up period, no significant difference was observed between both groups of patients in terms of the resorption of β-tricalcium phosphate, the significant differences were documented in the presence of radiolucency and bone trabeculation through the defect (P < 0.05). Using autologous mesenchymal stromal cells combined with a β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for management of bone defects with compromised microenvironment. The clinical trial was registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register before patient recruitment has begun (EudraCT number 2012-005599-33).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipTransplantation, AutologousAgedBone RegenerationBone RemodelingCalcium PhosphatesCancellous BoneFemaleFemurHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiddle AgedTissue ScaffoldsTreatment Outcomebeta-tricalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID27144159
PMCPMC4838782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.