Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27144092›Full record

ArticleAdipocyte

High-fat diet-induced obesity Rat model: a comparison between Wistar and Sprague-Dawley Rat.

Cláudia Marques, Manuela Meireles, Sónia Norberto, Joana Leite, Joana Freitas, Diogo Pestana, Ana Faria, Conceição Calhau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Adipocyte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 319 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cláudia MarquesDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Informação em Saúde; Porto, Portugal.
Manuela MeirelesDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto ; Porto, Portugal.
Sónia NorbertoDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto ; Porto, Portugal.
Joana LeiteDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto ; Porto, Portugal.
Joana FreitasDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro; Vila Real, Portugal.
Diogo PestanaDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Informação em Saúde; Porto, Portugal.
Ana FariaDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e da Alimentação; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Ciências; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal.
Conceição CalhauDepartamento de Bioquímica; Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade do Porto; Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Informação em Saúde; Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTFundação Faculdade de Medicina · BRCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTFaculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, obesity and associated metabolic complications have reached epidemic proportions. For the study of these pathologies, a number of animal models have been developed. However, a direct comparison between Wistar and Sprague-Dawley (SD) Rat as models of high-fat (HF) diet-induced obesity has not been adequately evaluated so far. Wistar and SD rats were assigned for 2 experimental groups for 17 weeks: standard (St) and high-fat (HF) diet groups. To assess some of the features of the metabolic syndrome, oral glucose tolerance tests, systolic blood pressure measurements and blood biochemical analysis were performed throughout the study. The gut microbiota composition of the animals of each group was evaluated at the end of the study by real-time PCR. HF diet increased weight gain, body fat mass, mesenteric adipocyte's size, adiponectin and leptin plasma levels and decreased oral glucose tolerance in both Wistar and SD rats. However, the majority of these effects were more pronounced or earlier detected in Wistar rats. The gut microbiota of SD rats was less abundant in Bacteroides and Prevotella but richer in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus comparatively to the gut microbiota of Wistar rats. Nevertheless, the modulation of the gut microbiota by HF diet was similar in both strains, except for Clostridium leptum that was only reduced in Wistar rats fed with HF diet. In conclusion, both Wistar and SD Rat can be used as models of HF diet-induced obesity although the metabolic effects caused by HF diet seemed to be more pronounced in Wistar Rat. Differences in the gut microbial ecology may account for the worsened metabolic scenario observed in Wistar Rat.

Indexed as

animal modelsdiet-induced obesityhigh-fat dietmetabolic syndromemicrobiotaobesity

Identifiers

PMID27144092
PMCPMC4836488
OpenAlexW1784628723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.