Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27143509›Full record

ReviewArchives of biochemistry and biophysics2016

Serial femtosecond crystallography: A revolution in structural biology.

Jose M Martin-Garcia, Chelsie E Conrad, Jesse Coe, Shatabdi Roy-Chowdhury, Petra Fromme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Plant structural biology: Emerging technologies and future biological insights.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Microfluidic Devices for High-Throughput In Situ Serial Crystallography.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Structural insights into full-length human fascin1: a target for cancer treatment.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. FLEXR: automated multi-conformer model building using electron-density map sampling.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose M Martin-GarciaSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, USA; Center for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7401, USA.
Chelsie E ConradSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, USA; Center for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7401, USA.
Jesse CoeSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, USA; Center for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7401, USA.
Shatabdi Roy-ChowdhurySchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, USA; Center for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7401, USA.
Petra FrommeSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, USA; Center for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7401, USA. Electronic address: pfromme@asu.edu.

Funding

Project 6 (Holton)U54GM094625 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STROUD, ROBERT M · 2010 to 2014
$8.0M
Femtosecond nano-crystallography of membrane proteinsR01GM095583 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FROMME, PETRA · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095583NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macromolecular crystallography at synchrotron sources has proven to be the most influential method within structural biology, producing thousands of structures since its inception. While its utility has been instrumental in progressing our knowledge of structures of molecules, it suffers from limitations such as the need for large, well-diffracting crystals, and radiation damage that can hamper native structural determination. The recent advent of X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) and their implementation in the emerging field of serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) has given rise to a remarkable expansion upon existing crystallographic constraints, allowing structural biologists access to previously restricted scientific territory. SFX relies on exceptionally brilliant, micro-focused X-ray pulses, which are femtoseconds in duration, to probe nano/micrometer sized crystals in a serial fashion. This results in data sets comprised of individual snapshots, each capturing Bragg diffraction of single crystals in random orientations prior to their subsequent destruction. Thus structural elucidation while avoiding radiation damage, even at room temperature, can now be achieved. This emerging field has cultivated new methods for nanocrystallogenesis, sample delivery, and data processing. Opportunities and challenges within SFX are reviewed herein.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularComputer SimulationCrystallizationProtein ConformationProteinsX-Ray DiffractionProteinsMembrane proteinsNanocrystalsProtein crystallographySerial femtosecond crystallographyX-ray free electron lasers

Identifiers

PMID27143509
PMCPMC4909539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.