Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27143500›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychological rehabilitation2018

The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: a systematic review.

Laura Murray, Christos Salis, Nadine Martin, Jenny Dralle

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06068296 (Towards a Clinical Test Battery for the Assessment of Verbal Short-term Memory Abilities With Linguistic Variations in Patients With Poststroke Aphasia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06068296 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Towards a Clinical Test Battery for the Assessment of Verbal Short-term Memory Abilities With Linguistic Variations in Patients With Poststroke Aphasia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2023 to 2023Enrolled9ConditionsAphasia, Acquired, Short-Term Memory ImpairmentArmsshort term memory assessment, Oxford cognitive screen, Token Test, Montreal cognitive assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Verbal fluency difficulties in aphasia: A combination of lexical and executive control deficits.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Short-Term Memory and Aphasia: From Theory to Treatment.Seminars in speech and language · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Murraya Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences , Indiana University , Bloomington , IN , USA.
Christos Salisb Speech & Language Sciences , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
Nadine Martinc Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders , Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Jenny Dralled Department of Neurology , Brandenburgklinik , Bernau bei Berlin , Germany.
Indiana University Bloomington · USNewcastle University · GBTemple University · US

Funding

Theory-driven treatment of language and cognitive processes in aphasiaR01DC013196 · NIDCD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MARTIN, NADINE · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
RELATION BETWEEN ATTENTION AND LANGUAGE IN APHASIAR01DC003886 · NIDCD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON · PI MURRAY, LAURA L · 1999 to 2003
$409k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003886NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairments of short-term and working memory (STM, WM), both verbal and non-verbal, are ubiquitous in aphasia. Increasing interest in assessing STM and WM in aphasia research and clinical practice as well as a growing evidence base of STM/WM treatments for aphasia warrant an understanding of the range of standardised STM/WM measures that have been utilised in aphasia. To date, however, no previous systematic review has focused on aphasia. Accordingly, the goals of this systematic review were: (1) to identify standardised tests of STM and WM utilised in the aphasia literature, (2) to evaluate critically the psychometric strength of these tests, and (3) to appraise critically the quality of the investigations utilising these tests. Results revealed that a very limited number of standardised tests, in the verbal and non-verbal domains, had robust psychometric properties. Standardisation samples to elicit normative data were often small, and most measures exhibited poor validity and reliability properties. Studies using these tests inconsistently documented demographic and aphasia variables essential to interpreting STM/WM test outcomes. In light of these findings, recommendations are provided to foster, in the future, consistency across aphasia studies and confidence in STM/WM tests as assessment and treatment outcome measures.

Indexed as

AphasiaHumansMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsaphasiaassessmentShort-term memorystandardised testsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID27143500
PMCPMC5263213
OpenAlexW2346489444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.