Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27143034›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016

Maternal obesity, gestational weight gain and childhood cardiac outcomes: role of childhood body mass index.

L Toemen, O Gishti, L van Osch-Gevers, E A P Steegers, W A Helbing, J F Felix, I K M Reiss, L Duijts, R Gaillard, V W V Jaddoe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Maternal obesity impairs fetal cardiomyocyte contractile function in sheep.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017.European journal of epidemiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L ToemenGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
O GishtiGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L van Osch-GeversDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W A HelbingDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J F FelixGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
I K M ReissDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L DuijtsGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R GaillardGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
V W V JaddoeGeneration R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal obesity may affect cardiovascular outcomes in the offspring. We examined the associations of maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with childhood cardiac outcomes and explored whether these associations were explained by parental characteristics, infant characteristics or childhood body mass index.

methodsIn a population-based prospective cohort study among 4852 parents and their children, we obtained maternal weight before pregnancy and in early, mid- and late pregnancy. At age 6 years, we measured aortic root diameter (cm) and left ventricular dimensions. We calculated left ventricular mass (g), left ventricular mass index (g m(-2.7)), relative wall thickness ((2 × left ventricular posterior wall thickness)/left ventricular diameter), fractional shorting (%), eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric remodeling.

resultsA one standard deviation score (SDS) higher maternal prepregnancy body mass index was associated with higher left ventricular mass (0.10 SDS (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08, 0.13)), left ventricular mass index (0.06 SDS (95% CI 0.03, 0.09)) and aortic root diameter (0.09 SDS (95% CI 0.06, 0.12)), but not with relative wall thickness or fractional shortening. A one SDS higher maternal prepregnancy body mass index was associated with an increased risk of eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio 1.21 (95% CI 1.03, 1.41)), but not of concentric remodeling. When analyzing the effects of maternal weight in different periods simultaneously, only maternal prepregnancy weight and early pregnancy weight were associated with left ventricular mass, left ventricular mass index and aortic root diameter (P-values<0.05), independent of weight in other pregnancy periods. All observed associations were independent of parental and infant characteristics, but attenuated to non-significance after adjustment for childhood body mass index.

conclusionMaternal prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain in early pregnancy are both associated with offspring cardiac structure in childhood, but these associations seem to be fully explained by childhood body mass index.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexMothersWeight GainAdultChildFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleNetherlandsObesityPregnancyPregnancy TrimestersPrenatal Exposure Delayed Effects

Identifiers

PMID27143034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.