ArticleSurgery today2016
Pediatric appendectomy: the outcome differences between pediatric surgeons and general surgeons.
Article in Surgery today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between Hospital Setting and Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Burden of Disease and Pathology at a Rapidly Expanding Tertiary Paediatric Surgical Unit in South Africa.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- The Right Child/Right Surgeon initiative: A position statement on pediatric surgical training, sub-specialization, and continuous certification from the American Pediatric Surgical Association.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2020Article
- Jejunal perforation as an unusual presentation of total colonic aganglionosis in a neonate: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to review our experience of pediatric appendectomy performed by either a general surgeon (GS) or a pediatric surgeon (PS) to determine any differences in outcomes.
methodsWe reviewed the medical records of pediatric appendicitis patients, 4 years before (GS group, 2007-2010) and after (PS group, 2011-2014) the introduction of a pediatric surgical practice. The records were reviewed for the following variables: operation time, length of hospital stay, complications, readmission in ≤30 days, type of operation, negative for appendicitis, drainage, open conversion, and reoperation in ≤30 days.
resultsOver 8 years, 400 patients were operated on for acute appendicitis, with the PS group comprising 61 % (N = 244) of patients. The operation time (55.1 vs 43.2 min, p = 0.0001) and postoperative length of hospital stay (3.5 vs 2.7 days, p = 0.001) were shorter, more patients were treated by laparoscopy (61.3 vs 91.2 %, p = 0.0001), and a fewer patients required peritoneal drainage (29.5 vs 63.2 %, p = 0.023) in the PS group than in the GS group. The negative appendectomy rate was slightly lower in the PS group, but not to a statistically significant degree.
conclusionThe patients in the PS group enjoyed a reduced operation time and length of hospital stay, greater likelihood of laparoscopic operation, and less peritoneal drainage than the patients in the GS group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27142973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.