Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142727›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Uptake and linkage into care over one year of providing HIV testing and counselling through community and health facility testing modalities in urban informal settlement of Kibera, Nairobi Kenya.

Samuel Muhula, Peter Memiah, Lilian Mbau, Happiness Oruko, Bebora Baker, Geoffrey Ikiara, Margaret Mungai, Meshack Ndirangu, Dunstan Achwoka, Festus Ilako

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel MuhulaAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. sam.muhula@gmail.com.
Peter MemiahUniversity of West Florida, College of Health, 11000 University Parkway, Building 38, Room #131, Pensacola, Fl.32514, USA.
Lilian MbauAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Happiness OrukoAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bebora BakerAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Geoffrey IkiaraAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Margaret MungaiAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Meshack NdiranguAmref Health Africa in Kenya, P.O Box 30125-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dunstan AchwokaDivision of Global HIV/AIDS (DGHA), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Village Market, P.O. Box 606-00621, Nairobi, Kenya.
Festus IlakoAmref Health Africa Headquarters, P.O Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe examine the uptake of HIV Testing and Counselling (HTC) and linkage into care over one year of providing HTC through community and health facility testing modalities among people living in Kibera informal urban settlement in Nairobi Kenya.

methodsWe analyzed program data on health facility-based HIV testing and counselling and community- based testing and counselling approaches for the period starting October 2013 to September 2014. Univariate and bivariate analysis methods were used to compare the two approaches with regard to uptake of HTC and subsequent linkage to care. The exact Confidence Intervals (CI) to the proportions were approximated using simple normal approximation to binomial distribution method.

resultsMajority of the 18,591 clients were tested through health facility-based testing approaches 72.5 % (n = 13485) vs those tested through community-based testing comprised 27.5 % (n = 5106). More clients tested at health facilities were reached through Provider Initiated Testing and Counselling PITC 81.7 % (n = 11015) while 18.3 % were reached through Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT)/Client Initiated Testing and Counselling (CITC) services. All clients who tested positive during health facility-based testing were successfully linked to care either at the project sites or sites of client choice while not all who tested positive during community based testing were linked to care. The HIV prevalence among all those who were tested for HIV in the program was 5.2 % (n = 52, 95 % CI: 3.9 %-6.8 %). Key study limitation included use of aggregate data to report uptake of HTC through the two testing approaches and not being able to estimate the population in the catchment area likely to test for HIV.

conclusionHealth facility-based HTC approach achieved more clients tested for HIV, and this method also resulted in identifying greater numbers of people who were HIV positive in Kibera slum within one year period of testing for HIV compared to community-based HTC approach. Linking HIV positive clients to care proved much easier during health facility- based HTC compared to community- based HTC.

Indexed as

Outpatient Clinics, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCitiesCommunity Health ServicesCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantKenyaMaleCommunity-based testingHealth facility-based testingKenyaKibera

Identifiers

PMID27142727
PMCPMC4855435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.