Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142682›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2016

The effect of early versus late treatment initiation after diagnosis on the outcomes of patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review.

Rebecca C Harris, Louis Grandjean, Laura J Martin, Alexander J P Miller, Joseph-Egre N Nkang, Victoria Allen, Mishal S Khan, Katherine Fielding, David A J Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca C HarrisTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. rebecca.harris@lshtm.ac.uk.
Louis GrandjeanDepartment of Infection, Immunology and Rheumatology, University College London, Institute of Child Health, Guilford Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Laura J MartinRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK.
Alexander J P MillerTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Joseph-Egre N NkangTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Victoria AllenChelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Mishal S KhanTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Katherine FieldingTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
David A J MooreTB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational University Health System · SGRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally it is estimated that 480 000 people developed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in 2014 and 190 000 people died from the disease. Successful treatment outcomes are achieved in only 50 % of patients with MDR-TB, compared to 86 % for drug susceptible disease. It is widely held that delay in time to initiation of treatment for MDR-TB is an important predictor of treatment outcome. The objective of this review was to assess the existing evidence on the outcomes of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients treated early (≤4 weeks) versus late (>4 weeks) after diagnosis of drug resistance.

methodsEight sources providing access to 17 globally representative electronic health care databases, indexes, sources of evidence-based reviews and grey literature were searched using terms incorporating time to treatment and MDR-TB. Two-stage sifting in duplicate was employed to assess studies against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only those articles reporting WHO-defined treatment outcomes were considered for inclusion. Articles reporting on fewer than 10 patients, published before 1990, or without a comparison of outcomes in patient groups experiencing different delays to treatment initiation were excluded.

resultsThe initial search yielded 1978 references, of which 1475 unique references remained after removal of duplicates and 28 articles published pre-1990. After title and abstract sifting, 64 papers underwent full text review. None of these articles fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the review.

conclusionsWhilst there is an inherent logic in the theory that treatment delay will lead to poorer treatment outcomes, no published evidence was identified in this systematic review to support this hypothesis. Reports of programmatic changes leading to reductions in treatment delay exist in the literature, but attribution of differences in outcomes specifically to treatment delay is confounded by other contemporaneous changes. Further primary research on this question is not considered a high priority use of limited resources, though where data are available, improved reporting of outcomes by time to treatment should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Extensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisHumansTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantExtensively drug resistantMulti-drug resistantSystematic reviewTreatment delayTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27142682
PMCPMC4855810
OpenAlexW2345334019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.