ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016
No Need of Immediate Treatment for Hypovascular Tumors Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial prophylaxis for 1 day versus 3 days in liver cancer surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.Surgery today · 2019Trial
- Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.Korean journal of radiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypovascular tumors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed, but it remains unknown whether such lesions should be treated immediately. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of treating hypovascular liver nodules.
methodsAfter diagnosis of hypovascular tumors smaller than 3 cm, 104 patients underwent liver resection immediately (Group 1), while 93 patients were placed under observation (Group 2). In Group 1, 98 patients were diagnosed as having HCC (Group 1'), while 80 patients in Group 2 underwent liver resection after vascularization or appearance of other hypervascular HCC (Group 2'), eight patients had been observed, and five patients could not undergo operation due to appearance of other multiple HCCs. To avoid lead time bias for tumor vascularization, survival rates of patients after diagnosis of hypovascular tumors as well as those after operation in the two groups were compared.
resultsAfter a median follow-up of 3.3 years (range 0.6-11.2), the 5-year overall survival rates after liver resection of Group 1' (74.8 %; 95 % CI 64.3-86.1) was significantly higher than that of Group 2' (59.2 %; 46.4-75.6; P = 0.027). However, the 5-year overall survival rates after diagnosis of hypovascular liver nodules of Group 1' (74.7 %; 66.1-85.0) was not significantly different from that of Group 2' (77.1 %; 67.0-88.6; P = 0.761). Consequently, the 5-year overall survival rate after diagnosis of Group 2 (75.6 %; 64.7-83.1) was not significantly different from that of Group 1 (73.2 %; 67.5-86.1; P = 0.591) by intention-to-treat analysis.
conclusionsIt is not necessary to treat hypovascular liver tumors immediately after diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.