Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142433›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2016

Single-cell profiling of human megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors identifies distinct megakaryocyte and erythroid differentiation pathways.

Bethan Psaila, Nikolaos Barkas, Deena Iskander, Anindita Roy, Stacie Anderson, Neil Ashley, Valentina S Caputo, Jens Lichtenberg, Sandra Loaiza, David M Bodine and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bethan PsailaCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nikolaos BarkasMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and BRC Blood Theme, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Centre, Oxford, UK.
Deena IskanderCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anindita RoyMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and BRC Blood Theme, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Centre, Oxford, UK.
Stacie AndersonFlow Cytometry Core, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Neil AshleyMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and BRC Blood Theme, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Centre, Oxford, UK.
Valentina S CaputoCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jens LichtenbergHematopoiesis Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sandra LoaizaCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David M BodineHematopoiesis Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anastasios KaradimitrisCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adam J MeadMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and BRC Blood Theme, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Centre, Oxford, UK. adam.mead@imm.ox.ac.uk.
Irene RobertsMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and BRC Blood Theme, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Centre, Oxford, UK. irene.roberts@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBImperial College London · GBNational Human Genome Research Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USHammersmith Hospital · GBOxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

NHGRI/DIR Flow Cytometry CoreZICHG200350 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, STACIE · 2010 to 2025
$16.3M
Hematopoietic Stem Cell BiologyZIAHG000083 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BODINE, DAVID M. · 2009 to 2022
$12.1M
Red Cell BiologyZIAHG200339 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BODINE, DAVID M. · 2009 to 2022
$11.8M
Arthritis Research UKBritish Heart FoundationMedical Research Council MC_PC_13073Medical Research Council MC_PC_14131Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/14Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/16Medical Research Council MR/L006340/1Medical Research Council MR/M00919X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in single-cell techniques have provided the opportunity to finely dissect cellular heterogeneity within populations previously defined by "bulk" assays and to uncover rare cell types. In human hematopoiesis, megakaryocytes and erythroid cells differentiate from a shared precursor, the megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEP), which remains poorly defined.

resultsTo clarify the cellular pathway in erythro-megakaryocyte differentiation, we correlate the surface immunophenotype, transcriptional profile, and differentiation potential of individual MEP cells. Highly purified, single MEP cells were analyzed using index fluorescence-activated cell sorting and parallel targeted transcriptional profiling of the same cells was performed using a specifically designed panel of genes. Differentiation potential was tested in novel, single-cell differentiation assays. Our results demonstrate that immunophenotypic MEP comprise three distinct subpopulations: "Pre-MEP," enriched for erythroid/megakaryocyte progenitors but with residual myeloid differentiation capacity; "E-MEP," strongly biased towards erythroid differentiation; and "MK-MEP," a previously undescribed, rare population of cells that are bipotent but primarily generate megakaryocytic progeny. Therefore, conventionally defined MEP are a mixed population, as a minority give rise to mixed-lineage colonies while the majority of cells are transcriptionally primed to generate exclusively single-lineage output.

conclusionsOur study clarifies the cellular hierarchy in human megakaryocyte/erythroid lineage commitment and highlights the importance of using a combination of single-cell approaches to dissect cellular heterogeneity and identify rare cell types within a population. We present a novel immunophenotyping strategy that enables the prospective identification of specific intermediate progenitor populations in erythro-megakaryopoiesis, allowing for in-depth study of disorders including inherited cytopenias, myeloproliferative disorders, and erythromegakaryocytic leukemias.

Indexed as

HematopoiesisAdultAgedCell LineageCell SeparationErythroid CellsFemaleHumansMaleMegakaryocyte-Erythroid Progenitor CellsMegakaryocytesMiddle AgedSingle-Cell AnalysiserythropoiesisHematopoiesishematopoietic stem cellmegakaryopoiesismyelopoiesisthrombopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID27142433
PMCPMC4855892
OpenAlexW2346768018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.