Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142387›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genetic features of red and green junglefowls and relationship with Indonesian native chickens Sumatera and Kedu Hitam.

Maria Ulfah, Ryouka Kawahara-Miki, Achmad Farajalllah, Muladno Muladno, Ben Dorshorst, Alison Martin, Tomohiro Kono

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria UlfahDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.
Ryouka Kawahara-MikiNODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Achmad FarajalllahDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.
Muladno MuladnoDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.
Ben DorshorstDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Alison MartinThe Livestock Conservancy, Pittsboro, NC, USA.
Tomohiro KonoNODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. tomohiro@nodai.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 2,500 breeds of chicken are reared throughout the world as a source of eggs or meat and as pets. The primary ancestor of the present domestic chicken is widely believed to be the red junglefowl, although genetic contributions from other junglefowls cannot be excluded entirely. The reference genome for chicken was obtained from a red junglefowl, the genetic purity of which has been debated. There is, at present, insufficient data to resolve these interesting issues.

resultsIn this study, we performed whole-genome sequencing to compare various species and breeds of chicken, including wild red and green junglefowl, as well as the Indonesian native chickens Sumatera and Kedu Hitam and their respective descendants, the American Black Sumatra and Black Java. The data indicate that wild junglefowls have retained their genetic identity, but the Indonesian and American breeds have not. The Black Sumatra and Black Java are now closely related to each other, suggesting loss of genetic identity after export to the United States. In addition, the results indicate that the red junglefowl used as reference genome is more closely related to domestic chickens and apparently different from other wild red junglefowls.

conclusionsThis study illuminates the genetic and phylogenetic relationships among these species. It provides a framework for genetic studies in wild junglefowls and native and domestic chicken breeds.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBreedingChickensEvolution, MolecularGenomeIndonesiaPhylogenyPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNAGreen junglefowlIndonesian native chickenMitochondrial DNAPhylogenyRed junglefowlSNPWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27142387
PMCPMC4855759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.