Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142368›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2016

"Nuts and Bolts" of Laboratory Evaluation of Angioedema.

Henriette Farkas, Nóra Veszeli, Erika Kajdácsi, László Cervenak, Lilian Varga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers in Hereditary Angioedema.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021
    Review
  11. Resolution of Laryngeal Oedema in a Patient with Acquired C1-Inhibitor Deficiency. a Case Report.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2021
    Article
  12. Recurrent angioedema: Experience at a tertiary care urban medical center.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021
    Article
  13. Idiopathic Angioedema: Current Challenges.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2020
    Review
  14. Angioedema suppressed by a combination of anti-histamine and leukotriene modifier.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henriette FarkasResearch Laboratory, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Budapest, Hungary. farkas.henriette@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.
Nóra VeszeliResearch Laboratory, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Budapest, Hungary.
Erika KajdácsiResearch Laboratory, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Budapest, Hungary.
László CervenakResearch Laboratory, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Budapest, Hungary.
Lilian VargaResearch Laboratory, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angioedema, as a distinct disease entity, often becomes a clinical challenge for physicians, because it may cause a life-threatening condition, whereas prompt and accurate laboratory diagnostics may not be available. Although the bedside diagnosis needs to be established based on clinical symptoms and signs, family history, and the therapeutic response, later, laboratory tests are available. Currently, only for five out of the nine different types of angioedema can be diagnosed by laboratory testing, and these occur only in a minority of the patient population. Hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency type I can be diagnosed by the low C1-INH function and concentration, whereas in type II, C1-INH function is low, but its concentration is normal or even elevated. C1q concentration is normal in both forms. Acquired angioedema with C1-INH deficiency type I is characterized by the low C1-INH function and concentration; however, C1q concentration is also low, and autoantibodies against C1-INH cannot be detected. Complement profile of acquired angioedema with C1-INH deficiency type II is similar to that of type I, but in this form, autoantibodies against C1-INH are present. Hereditary angioedema due to a mutation of the coagulation factor XII can be diagnosed exclusively by mutation analysis of FXII gene. Diagnostic metrics are not available for idiopathic histaminergic acquired angioedema, idiopathic non-histaminergic acquired angioedema, acquired angioedema related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and hereditary angioedema of unknown origin; these angioedemas can be diagnosed by medical and family history, clinical symptoms, and therapeutic response and by excluding the forms previously described. Several potential biomarkers of angioedema are used to date only in research. In the future, they could be utilized into the clinical practice to improve the differential diagnosis, therapy, as well as the prognosis of angioedema.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAngioedemaAngioedemas, HereditaryBiomarkersDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresHumansPhenotypeBiomarkersAngioedemaBiomarkersC1-inhibitorDiagnosisLaboratory parameters

Identifiers

PMID27142368
OpenAlexW2345876438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.