Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142281›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2016

Development of radiation exposure in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation in Germany between 2007 and 2014: great potential to minimize radiation dosage.

Thomas Kleemann, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Dietrich Andresen, Stephan Willems, Stefan G Spitzer, Ellen Hoffmann, Lars Eckardt, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Guideline
  4. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society.Heart rhythm · 2012
    Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of a near-zero fluoroscopy approach in interventional electrophysiology: impact of operator experience.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas KleemannMedizinische Klinik B, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany. kleemann.thomas@web.de.
Johannes BrachmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Second Medical Clinic, Coburg Hospital, Coburg, Germany.
Thorsten LewalterPeter Osypka Herzzentrum München, Internistische Klinik Dr. Müller, München-Thalkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Dietrich AndresenDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan WillemsDepartment of Electrophysiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan G SpitzerPraxisklinik Herz und Gefäße, Dresden, Germany.
Ellen HoffmannKlinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Krankenhaus München Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.
Lars EckardtDivision of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Matthias HochadelStiftung Institute for Myocardial Infarction, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Jochen SengesStiftung Institute for Myocardial Infarction, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz KuckDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Karlheinz SeidlMedizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Ralf ZahnMedizinische Klinik B, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to analyze the radiation usage in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in Germany and to evaluate the possibility to reduce radiation dose. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 6617 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from the German ablation registry and the FREEZEplus registry (control group), who underwent first PVI between 2007 and 2014, were analyzed. In the second step, the effect of optimized conventional fluoroscopy and optimized 3D mapping use was evaluated in 526 consecutive patients with AF who underwent first PVI at the Klinikum Ludwigshafen (optimized group) between 2007 and 2014. In the control group, the median dose area product (DAP) for PVI was 34 Gy cm(2), and the median DAP rate was 1.3 Gy cm(2)/min. The DAP decreased from 37 to 28 Gy cm(2), whereas the DAP rate increased from 1.3 to 1.6 Gy cm(2)/min between 2007 and 2014. In the optimized group, optimized radiation application and use of 3D mapping resulted in a continuous decrease in the DAP from 67 to 2 Gy cm(2) and DAP rate from 1.0 to 0.2 Gy cm(2)/min.

conclusionCurrently, the median radiation exposure during PVI in Germany is 28 Gy cm(2). Optimized fluoroscopy by simple means can safely reduce the radiation dose to about 2 Gy cm(2) or even lower when using 3D mapping. Before introducing novel expensive technologies for radiation reduction optimizing of the conventional fluoroscopy is mandatory.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationPhlebographyRadiation DosageRadiography, InterventionalAgedAtrial FibrillationFemaleFluoroscopyGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary VeinsRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRegistriesAblationAtrial fibrillationPulmonary vein isolationRadiation dosage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.