Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142161›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2016

Rationing in the intensive care unit in case of full bed occupancy: a survey among intensive care unit physicians.

Anke J M Oerlemans, Hub Wollersheim, Nelleke van Sluisveld, Johannes G van der Hoeven, Wim J M Dekkers, Marieke Zegers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anke J M OerlemansRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. anke.oerlemans@radboudumc.nl.
Hub WollersheimRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nelleke van SluisveldRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes G van der HoevenRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wim J M DekkersRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke ZegersRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, there is no consensus on how to best deal with admission requests in cases of full ICU bed occupancy. Knowledge about the degree of dissension and insight into the reasons for this dissension is lacking. Information about the opinion of ICU physicians can be used to improve decision-making regarding allocation of ICU resources. The aim of this study was to: Assess which factors play a role in the decision-making process regarding the admission of ICU patients; Assess the adherence to a Dutch guideline pertaining to rationing of ICU resources; Investigate factors influencing the adherence to this guideline.

methodsIn March 2013, an online questionnaire was sent to all ICU physician members (n = 761, in 90 hospitals) of the Dutch Society for Intensive Care.

results166 physicians (21.8 %) working in 64 different Dutch hospitals (71.1 %) completed the questionnaire. Factors associated with a patient's physical condition and quality of life were generally considered most important in admission decisions. Scenario-based adherence to the Dutch guideline "Admission request in case of full ICU bed occupancy" was found to be low (adherence rate 50.0 %). There were two main reasons for this poor compliance: unfamiliarity with the guideline and disagreement with the fundamental approach underlying the guideline.

conclusionsDutch ICU physicians disagree about how to deal with admission requests in cases of full ICU bed occupancy. The results of this study contribute to the discussion about the fundamental principles regarding admission of ICU patients in case of full bed occupancy.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBed OccupancyIntensive Care UnitsPatient AdmissionAdultDecision MakingFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCritical CareEthicsIntensive Care UnitsRationingResource Allocation

Identifiers

PMID27142161
PMCPMC4855768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.