Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142091›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

Biomarkers and biometric measures of adherence to use of ARV-based vaginal rings.

Randy M Stalter, Thomas R Moench, Kathleen M MacQueen, Elizabeth E Tolley, Derek H Owen, Consortium for Ring Adherence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibody-mediated immune exclusion of HIV.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Randy M StalterContraceptive Technology Innovation Department, FHI 360 Durham, NC, USA; rstalter@fhi360.org.
Thomas R MoenchReProtect, Inc. Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen M MacQueenGlobal Health Research Department, FHI 360 Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth E TolleyGlobal Health Research Department, FHI 360 Durham, NC, USA.
Derek H OwenContraceptive Technology Innovation Department, FHI 360 Durham, NC, USA.
Consortium for Ring Adherence

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor adherence to product use has been observed in recent trials of antiretroviral (ARV)-based oral and vaginal gel HIV prevention products, resulting in an inability to determine product efficacy. The delivery of microbicides through vaginal rings is widely perceived as a way to achieve better adherence but vaginal rings do not eliminate the adherence challenges exhibited in clinical trials. Improved objective measures of adherence are needed as new ARV-based vaginal ring products enter the clinical trial stage.

methodsTo identify technologies that have potential future application for vaginal ring adherence measurement, a comprehensive literature search was conducted that covered a number of biomedical and public health databases, including PubMed, Embase, POPLINE and the Web of Science. Published patents and patent applications were also searched. Technical experts were also consulted to gather more information and help evaluate identified technologies. Approaches were evaluated as to feasibility of development and clinical trial implementation, cost and technical strength.

resultsNumerous approaches were identified through our landscape analysis and classified as either point measures or cumulative measures of vaginal ring adherence. Point measurements are those that give a measure of adherence at a particular point in time. Cumulative measures attempt to measure ring adherence over a period of time. DISCUSSION: Approaches that require modifications to an existing ring product are at a significant disadvantage, as this will likely introduce additional regulatory barriers to the development process and increase manufacturing costs. From the point of view of clinical trial implementation, desirable attributes would be high acceptance by trial participants, and little or no additional time or training requirements on the part of participants or clinic staff. We have identified four promising approaches as being high priority for further development based on the following measurements: intracellular drug levels, drug levels in hair, the accumulation of a vaginal analyte that diffuses into the ring, and the depletion of an intrinsic ring constituent.

conclusionsWhile some approaches show significant promise over others, it is recommended that a strategy of using complementary biometric and behavioural approaches be adopted to best understand participants' adherence to ARV-based ring products in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemaleMedication AdherenceAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBiomarkersFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBiomarkersVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jelliesadherenceantiretroviralsbiomarkersbiometricsclinical trialsHIVpreventionvaginal rings

Identifiers

PMID27142091
PMCPMC4854848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.