Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27142052›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2016

Responsiveness of electrical nociceptive detection thresholds to capsaicin (8 %)-induced changes in nociceptive processing.

Robert J Doll, Guido van Amerongen, Justin L Hay, Geert J Groeneveld, Peter H Veltink, Jan R Buitenweg

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J DollBiomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Zuidhorst, ZH-222, Drienerlolaan 5, PO BOX 217, Enschede, The Netherlands. r.j.doll@utwente.nl.
Guido van AmerongenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Justin L HayCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Geert J GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter H VeltinkBiomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Zuidhorst, ZH-222, Drienerlolaan 5, PO BOX 217, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jan R BuitenwegBiomedical Signals and Systems, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Zuidhorst, ZH-222, Drienerlolaan 5, PO BOX 217, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain disorders can be initiated and maintained by malfunctioning of one or several mechanisms underlying the nociceptive function. Psychophysical procedures allow the estimation of nociceptive detection thresholds using intra-epidermal electrical stimuli. By varying the temporal properties of electrical stimuli, various contributions of nociceptive processes to stimulus processing can be observed. To observe the responsiveness of nociceptive thresholds to changes in nociceptive function, a model of capsaicin-induced nerve defunctionalization was used. Its effect on nociceptive detections thresholds was investigated over a period of 84 days. A cutaneous capsaicin (8 %) patch was applied for 60 min to the upper leg of eight healthy human participants. Single- and double-pulse electrical stimuli were presented in a pseudo-random order using an intra-epidermal electrode. Stimuli and corresponding responses were recorded on both treated and untreated skin areas prior to capsaicin application and on days 2, 7, 28, and 84. Increases in electrical detection thresholds at the capsaicin area were observed on days 2 and 7 for single-pulse stimuli. Detection thresholds corresponding to double-pulse stimuli were increased on days 7 and 28, suggesting a delayed and longer lasting effect on double-pulse stimuli. In the present study, it was demonstrated that the responsiveness of detection thresholds to capsaicin application depends on the temporal properties of electrical stimuli. The observation of capsaicin-induced changes by estimation of detection thresholds revealed different time patterns of contributions of peripheral and central mechanisms to stimulus processing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCapsaicinElectric StimulationFemaleHot TemperatureHumansHyperalgesiaMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPhysical StimulationPsychophysicsCapsaicinCapsaicinIntra-epidermal electrical stimulationNociceptionPsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID27142052
PMCPMC4978767
OpenAlexW2345668163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.