Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141951›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Effect of a pro-breastfeeding intervention on the maintenance of breastfeeding for 2 years or more: randomized clinical trial with adolescent mothers and grandmothers.

Cristiano Francisco da Silva, Leandro Meirelles Nunes, Renata Schwartz, Elsa Regina Justo Giugliani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00910377 (Effect of Intervention About Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding in Adolescent Mothers and Their Grandmothers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00910377 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Intervention About Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding in Adolescent Mothers and Their Grandmothers

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreRan2006 to 2009Enrolled344ConditionsBreastfeeding, WeaningArmscounseling sessions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristiano Francisco da SilvaGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. fscriss@gmail.com.
Leandro Meirelles NunesGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Renata SchwartzGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Elsa Regina Justo GiuglianiGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing an adolescent mother and cohabiting with the maternal grandmother have been shown to be risk factors for a shorter breastfeeding duration. The objective of this study was to assess whether the positive effects of a pro-breastfeeding intervention aimed at adolescent mothers and maternal grandmothers on the prevalence of breastfeeding observed in the first year of life were maintained at 2 years of age.

methodsThis study is the continuation of a randomized clinical trial initiated in 2006 involving 323 adolescent mothers, their newborns and maternal grandmothers when cohabiting. The intervention consisted of six breastfeeding counseling sessions, the first one held at the maternity ward and the others at the participants' homes at 7, 15, 30, 60, and 120 days postpartum. The present study reports data collected when the children were 4 to 7 years old, concerning the maintenance of breastfeeding at 2 years. Data were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression model with robust variance, with breastfeeding at 2 years of age as the outcome.

resultsMaintenance of breastfeeding for 2 years or more was present in 32.2% of the sample. When the intervention and control groups were compared, the prevalence of breastfeeding at 2 years was similar (29.9 vs. 34.3%, respectively; p = 0.605). Multivariable analysis failed to reveal an association between exposure to the intervention and maintenance of breastfeeding at 2 years in the different models tested.

conclusionsThe positive impact of the intervention on the prevalence of breastfeeding observed in the first year of life was not maintained at 2 years of age.

trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 28, 2009 under protocol no. NCT00910377.

Indexed as

Intergenerational RelationsAdolescentBreast FeedingChildChild, PreschoolCounselingFemaleGrandparentsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMothersPostpartum PeriodAdolescentBreastfeedingControlled randomized clinical trialInfant nutrition

Identifiers

PMID27141951
PMCPMC4855844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.