Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141862›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2016

Endocytosis in gene therapy with non-viral vectors.

Aritz Perez Ruiz de Garibay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aritz Perez Ruiz de GaribayInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Laboratoire d'Immunopathologie et Chimie Thérapeutique, CNRS, 67000, Strasbourg, France. a.perez@ibmc-cnrs.unistra.fr.
Immunologie, Immunopathologie et Chimie Thérapeutique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy or the delivery of genetic material can be carried out not only with viral vectors, but with non-viral vectors too. Although the use of non-viral carriers is safer, this approach has generally been poorer in terms of transfection efficiency. In order to improve the transfection rates, it is important to exactly know the path that the nanoparticles go through. In this way, we can understand the reason why some of these vectors fail or are successful in their duties. This review aims to summarize the different stages and barriers that nanocarriers have to overcome during endocytosis so as to reach the cytoplasm, in the case of RNA, or the nucleus, in the case of DNA. In addition, different strategies that could be employed to improve the success of the carriers in each stage are suggested.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesDNAEndocytosisGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansNanoparticlesRNATransfectionDNARNADNAEndocytosisGene therapyNanoparticlesNon-viral vectorsRNA

Identifiers

PMID27141862
OpenAlexW2345503771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.