Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141838›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Individual differences in brain responses to cigarette-related cues and pleasant stimuli in young smokers.

Jeffrey M Engelmann, Francesco Versace, Jonathan C Gewirtz, Paul M Cinciripini

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Beyond Cue Reactivity: Non-Drug-Related Motivationally Relevant Stimuli Are Necessary to Understand Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey M EngelmannDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States. Electronic address: jmengelmann@mdanderson.org.
Francesco VersaceOklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, and Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, United States.
Jonathan C GewirtzDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, United States.
Paul M CinciripiniDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training Program in Cognitive ScienceT32HD007151 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KERSTEN, DANIEL J · 1985 to 2013
$4.4M
Incentive salience and the neuropsychological underpinnings of cue-induced smoking relapseR01DA032581 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VERSACE, FRANCESCO · 2012 to 2024
$2.5M
Neurobiological substrates of imminent smoking: A missing link in cue reactivityK01DA034752 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ENGELMANN, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$809k
Neurobehavioral Assessment of Reward Sensitivity in Young SmokersR21DA038001 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VERSACE, FRANCESCO · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007151NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA034752NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032581NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecreased sensitivity to pleasant stimuli is associated with a higher vulnerability to nicotine dependence in youths and with difficulty quitting in adult smokers. Recently, we showed that smokers showing lower brain reactivity to non-cigarette-related pleasant images than to cigarette-related ones have lower chances of achieving long-term abstinence during a quit attempt.

methodsWe tested whether individual differences in brain responses to cigarette-related and pleasant stimuli require a long history of smoking to develop by measuring the late positive potential (LPP) to cigarette cues, emotional, and neutral stimuli in 45 young, light smokers (ages 18-25). k-means cluster analysis was used to partition smokers into two groups based on the magnitude of their LPPs.

resultsGroup 1 was characterized by larger LPPs to pleasant pictures than cigarette-related pictures whereas Group 2 showed the opposite pattern.

conclusionsOur results suggest that individual differences in brain responses to cigarette-related and pleasant cues do not require a long smoking history to develop.

Indexed as

CuesIndividualityTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultBrainEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPleasureSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderAddictionEmotionSmokingYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID27141838
PMCPMC4880545
OpenAlexW2344540456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.