ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2016
Consensus Statement on Electronic Health Predictive Analytics: A Guiding Framework to Address Challenges.
Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic patient-reported outcomes and machine learning in predicting immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Trial
- Developer Perspectives on Potential Harms of Machine Learning Predictive Analytics in Health Care: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Exploring patient perspectives on how they can and should be engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in health care.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Epistemic Rights and Responsibilities of Digital Simulacra for Biomedicine.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023Article
- Use of Big Data and Ethical Issues for Populations With Substance Use Disorder.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an approach to clinical decision support for preventing inpatient falls: a pragmatic trial.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Prediction tool Development and Implementation in pharmacy praCTice (PreDICT) proposed guidance.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2023Article
- Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Literature Review and Content Analysis of Frameworks.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Review
- Article
- Realizing the Promise of Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening in Practice.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Early renal function trajectories, cytomegalovirus serostatus and long-term graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Development of Electronic Health Record-Based Prediction Models for 30-Day Readmission Risk Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2020Article
- Including Social and Behavioral Determinants in Predictive Models: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Integrating machine-generated mortality estimates and behavioral nudges to promote serious illness conversations for cancer patients: Design and methods for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Article
- Transformation of the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Big Data, Accountable Care, and Predictive Health Analytics.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2019Article
- Secondary use of routine data in hospitals: description of a scalable analytical platform based on a business intelligence system.JAMIA open · 2018Article
- American Joint Replacement Registry Risk Calculator Does Not Predict 90-day Mortality in Veterans Undergoing Total Joint Replacement.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe recent explosion in available electronic health record (EHR) data is motivating a rapid expansion of electronic health care predictive analytic (e-HPA) applications, defined as the use of electronic algorithms that forecast clinical events in real time with the intent to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. There is an urgent need for a systematic framework to guide the development and application of e-HPA to ensure that the field develops in a scientifically sound, ethical, and efficient manner.
objectivesBuilding upon earlier frameworks of model development and utilization, we identify the emerging opportunities and challenges of e-HPA, propose a framework that enables us to realize these opportunities, address these challenges, and motivate e-HPA stakeholders to both adopt and continuously refine the framework as the applications of e-HPA emerge.
methodsTo achieve these objectives, 17 experts with diverse expertise including methodology, ethics, legal, regulation, and health care delivery systems were assembled to identify emerging opportunities and challenges of e-HPA and to propose a framework to guide the development and application of e-HPA.
findingsThe framework proposed by the panel includes three key domains where e-HPA differs qualitatively from earlier generations of models and algorithms (Data Barriers, Transparency, and ETHICS) and areas where current frameworks are insufficient to address the emerging opportunities and challenges of e-HPA (Regulation and Certification; and Education and Training). The following list of recommendations summarizes the key points of the framework: Data Barriers: Establish mechanisms within the scientific community to support data sharing for predictive model development and testing.Transparency: Set standards around e-HPA validation based on principles of scientific transparency and reproducibility. ETHICS: Develop both individual-centered and society-centered risk-benefit approaches to evaluate e-HPA.Regulation and Certification: Construct a self-regulation and certification framework within e-HPA.Education and Training: Make significant changes to medical, nursing, and paraprofessional curricula by including training for understanding, evaluating, and utilizing predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.