Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141461›Full record

ReviewJournal of reproduction & infertility

Models Predicting Success of Infertility Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Alireza Zarinara, Hojjat Zeraati, Koorosh Kamali, Kazem Mohammad, Parisa Shahnazari, Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of reproduction & infertility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modelling and comparing the use of IVF and ICSI in Australia.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?JBRA assisted reproduction · 2019
    Article
  20. Improving the safety of the embryo and the patient duringWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alireza ZarinaraReproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Hojjat ZeraatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, TUMS, Tehran, Iran.
Koorosh KamaliReproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Kazem MohammadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, TUMS, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa ShahnazariReproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Mehdi AkhondiReproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertile couples are faced with problems that affect their marital life. Infertility treatment is expensive and time consuming and occasionally isn't simply possible. Prediction models for infertility treatment have been proposed and prediction of treatment success is a new field in infertility treatment. Because prediction of treatment success is a new need for infertile couples, this paper reviewed previous studies for catching a general concept in applicability of the models.

methodsThis study was conducted as a systematic review at Avicenna Research Institute in 2015. Six data bases were searched based on WHO definitions and MESH key words. Papers about prediction models in infertility were evaluated.

resultsEighty one papers were eligible for the study. Papers covered years after 1986 and studies were designed retrospectively and prospectively. IVF prediction models have more shares in papers. Most common predictors were age, duration of infertility, ovarian and tubal problems.

conclusionPrediction model can be clinically applied if the model can be statistically evaluated and has a good validation for treatment success. To achieve better results, the physician and the couples' needs estimation for treatment success rate were based on history, the examination and clinical tests. Models must be checked for theoretical approach and appropriate validation. The privileges for applying the prediction models are the decrease in the cost and time, avoiding painful treatment of patients, assessment of treatment approach for physicians and decision making for health managers. The selection of the approach for designing and using these models is inevitable.

Indexed as

ARTInfertility treatmentPrediction modelTreatment success

Identifiers

PMID27141461
PMCPMC4842237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.