Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141322›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2016

Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images.

Amit Sethi, Lingdao Sha, Abhishek Ramnath Vahadane, Ryan J Deaton, Neeraj Kumar, Virgilia Macias, Peter H Gann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Multi-Organ Nucleus Segmentation Challenge.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020
    Article
  9. Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit SethiDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India; Department of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lingdao ShaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abhishek Ramnath VahadaneDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Ryan J DeatonDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neeraj KumarDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Virgilia MaciasDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Peter H GannDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USIndian Institute of Technology Guwahati · IN

Funding

Validation of Digital Morphometry for Cancer Risk in Benign Prostate BiopsiesR01CA155301 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GANN, PETER H. · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextColor normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines.

aimsWe compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification. SETTINGS AND

designExpert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images. MATERIALS AND

methodsEpithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared.

resultsKhan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images.

conclusionsColor normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.

Indexed as

Color normalizationcomputational pathologyepithelial-stromal classification

Identifiers

PMID27141322
PMCPMC4837797
OpenAlexW2335197832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.