ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2016
Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning models for cervical cancer subtyping using whole slide images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: clinical promise and deployment considerations.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Review
- Deep Learning Methodologies Applied to Digital Pathology in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Stain normalization in digital pathology: Clinical multi-center evaluation of image quality.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Breast histopathological image analysis using image processing techniques for diagnostic puposes: A methodological review.Journal of medical systems · 2021Review
- Article
- A Multi-Organ Nucleus Segmentation Challenge.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Review
- Introduction to Digital Image Analysis in Whole-slide Imaging: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association.Journal of pathology informatics · 2019Review
- Classification of Tumor Epithelium and Stroma by Exploiting Image Features Learned by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Novel chromaticity similarity based color texture descriptor for digital pathology image analysis.PloS one · 2018Article
- An alternative reference space for H&E color normalization.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
contextColor normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines.
aimsWe compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification. SETTINGS AND
designExpert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images. MATERIALS AND
methodsEpithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared.
resultsKhan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images.
conclusionsColor normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.