Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27141318›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2016

Summary of third Nordic symposium on digital pathology.

Claes Lundström, Marie Waltersson, Anders Persson, Darren Treanor

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Iris: A Next Generation Digital Pathology Rendering Engine.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025
    Article
  2. Summary of the 4Journal of pathology informatics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claes LundströmCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, UK.
Marie WalterssonCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, UK.
Anders PerssonCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, UK.
Darren TreanorCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, UK; Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK; Department of Cellular Pathology, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-disciplinary and cross-sectorial collaboration is a key success factor for turning the promise of digital pathology into actual clinical benefits. The Nordic symposium on digital pathology (NDP) was created to promote knowledge exchange in this area, among stakeholders in health care, industry, and academia. This article is a summary of the third NDP symposium in Linkφping, Sweden. The Nordic experiences, including several hospitals using whole-slide imaging for substantial parts of their primary reviews, formed a fertile base for discussions among the 190 NDP attendees originating from 15 different countries. This summary also contains results from a survey on adoption and validation aspects of clinical digital pathology use.

Indexed as

Implementationpathology informaticsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID27141318
PMCPMC4837798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.