ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2016
3D micro-CT analysis of void formations and push-out bonding strength of resin cements used for fiber post cementation.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of digitally designed endodontic posts: a micro-computed tomography analysis of intraoral scanner and extraoral scanning techniques.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners across varied depths and widths preparation for CAD/CAM post and core.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Bond strength and void formation of self-adhesive resin cement with polyethylene fiber posts in the root canal systems.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of luting materials and root third on glass fiber posts bonding strength after hydrothermal aging.PloS one · 2026Article
- Fracture Resistance of Commercial and Novel Ceramic-Reinforced Polymer Crowns with Luting Cements of Varying Elastic Modulus.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of the effect of spacer material on gap and void formation in an endodontic temporary restoration using micro-computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Review
- Nano-CT as tool for characterization of dental resin composites.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Diffractive small angle X-ray scattering imaging for anisotropic structures.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques.The Saudi dental journal · 2019Article
- Effect of Relining with Different Composite Resins on the Push-out Bond Strength of Anatomical Fiber Posts to Root Canal Dentin.Iranian endodontic journal · 2019Article
- Fracture Strength of Flared Root Canals Restored with Different Post Systems.European endodontic journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the void parameters within the resin cements used for fiber post cementation by micro-CT (µCT) and regional push-out bonding strength. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-one, single and round shaped roots were enlarged with a low-speed drill following by endodontic treatment. The roots were divided into three groups (n=7) and fiber posts were cemented with Maxcem Elite, Multilink N and Superbond C&B resin cements. Specimens were scanned using µCT scanner at resolution of 13.7 µm. The number, area, and volume of voids between dentin and post were evaluated. A method of analysis based on the post segmentation was used, and coronal, middle and apical thirds considered separately. After the µCT analysis, roots were embedded in epoxy resin and sectioned into 2 mm thick slices (63 sections in total). Push-out testing was performed with universal testing device at 0.5 mm/min cross-head speed. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05).
resultsOverall, significant differences between the resin cements and the post level were observed in the void number, area, and volume (P<.05). Super-Bond C&B showed the most void formation (44.86 ± 22.71). Multilink N showed the least void surface (3.51 ± 2.24 mm(2)) and volume (0.01 ± 0.01 mm(3)). Regional push-out bond strength of the cements was not different (P>.05).
conclusionµCT proved to be a powerful non-destructive 3D analysis tool for visualizing the void parameters. Multilink N had the lowest void parameters. When efficiency of all cements was evaluated, direct relationship between the post region and push-out bonding strength was not observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.