Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27140600›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Functional evolution of IGF2:IGF2R domain 11 binding generates novel structural interactions and a specific IGF2 antagonist.

Susana Frago, Ryan D Nicholls, Madeleine Strickland, Jennifer Hughes, Christopher Williams, Lee Garner, Mirvat Surakhy, Rory Maclean, Dellel Rezgui, Stuart N Prince and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Liver Expression ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susana FragoTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Ryan D NichollsDepartment of Organic and Biological Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom;
Madeleine StricklandDepartment of Organic and Biological Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom;
Jennifer HughesTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Christopher WilliamsDepartment of Organic and Biological Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom;
Lee GarnerTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Mirvat SurakhyTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;ORCID 0000-0001-7101-984X
Rory MacleanTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Dellel RezguiTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Stuart N PrinceTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Oliver J ZaccheoTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Daniel EbnerTarget Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom;
Sabina SanegreTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom;
Sheng YuDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
Francesca M BuffaDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
Matthew P CrumpDepartment of Organic and Biological Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom; matt.crump@bristol.ac.uk bass.hassan@path.ox.ac.uk.
Andrew Bassim HassanTumour Growth Control Group, Oxford Molecular Pathology Institute, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom; matt.crump@bristol.ac.uk bass.hassan@path.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 9891Medical Research Council MC_PC_15029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the 15 extracellular domains of the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R), domain 11 has evolved a binding site for IGF2 to negatively regulate ligand bioavailability and mammalian growth. Despite the highly evolved structural loops of the IGF2:domain 11 binding site, affinity-enhancing AB loop mutations suggest that binding is modifiable. Here we examine the extent to which IGF2:domain 11 affinity, and its specificity over IGF1, can be enhanced, and we examine the structural basis of the mechanistic and functional consequences. Domain 11 binding loop mutants were selected by yeast surface display combined with high-resolution structure-based predictions, and validated by surface plasmon resonance. We discovered previously unidentified mutations in the ligand-interacting surface binding loops (AB, CD, FG, and HI). Five combined mutations increased rigidity of the AB loop, as confirmed by NMR. When added to three independently identified CD and FG loop mutations that reduced the koff value by twofold, these mutations resulted in an overall selective 100-fold improvement in affinity. The structural basis of the evolved affinity was improved shape complementarity established by interloop (AB-CD) and intraloop (FG-FG) side chain interactions. The high affinity of the combinatorial domain 11 Fc fusion proteins functioned as ligand-soluble antagonists or traps that depleted pathological IGF2 isoforms from serum and abrogated IGF2-dependent signaling in vivo. An evolved and reengineered high-specificity M6P/IGF2R domain 11 binding site for IGF2 may improve therapeutic targeting of the frequent IGF2 gain of function observed in human cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionCell Line, TumorCrystallography, X-RayDirected Molecular EvolutionHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIModels, MolecularPichiaProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsReceptor, IGF Type 2IGF2 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIReceptor, IGF Type 2binding kineticsbiological therapygrowth factor receptorinsulin-like growth factor 2protein evolution

Identifiers

PMID27140600
PMCPMC4878476
OpenAlexW2346928387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.