Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27140517›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2016

Intragraft Antiviral-Specific Gene Expression as a Distinctive Transcriptional Signature for Studies in Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy.

Tara K Sigdel, Oriol Bestard, Nathan Salomonis, Szu-Chuan Hsieh, Joan Torras, Maarten Naesens, Tim Q Tran, Silke Roedder, Minnie M Sarwal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. T Cells With ActivatedFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IdentifyingJournal of immunology research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cellular Immunity Against BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Tara K Sigdel1 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2 Kidney Transplant Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, UB, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 4 Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Oriol Bestard
Nathan Salomonis
Szu-Chuan Hsieh
Joan Torras
Maarten Naesens
Tim Q Tran
Silke Roedder
Minnie M Sarwal
Apple (Israel) · IL

Funding

Urinary Proteome Monitoring for Transplant InjuryR01DK083447 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CAMP, DAVID G, SARWAL, MINNIE M · 2010 to 2013
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyomavirus nephropathy (PVAN) is a common cause of kidney allograft dysfunction and loss. To identify PVAN-specific gene expression and underlying molecular mechanisms, we analyzed kidney biopsies with and without PVAN.

methodsThe study included 168 posttransplant renal allograft biopsies (T cell-mediated rejection [TCMR] = 26, PVAN = 10, normal functioning graft = 73, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy = 59) from 168 unique kidney allograft recipients. We performed gene expression assays and bioinformatics analysis to identify a set of PVAN-specific genes. Validity and relevance of a subset of these genes are validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

resultsUnsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of all the biopsies revealed high similarity between PVAN and TCMR gene expression. Increased statistical stringency identified 158 and 252 unique PVAN and TCMR injury-specific gene transcripts respectively. Although TCMR-specific genes were overwhelmingly involved in immune response costimulation and TCR signaling, PVAN-specific genes were mainly related to DNA replication process, RNA polymerase assembly, and pathogen recognition receptors. A principal component analysis (PCA) using these genes further confirmed the most optimal separation between the 3 different clinical phenotypes. Validation of 4 PVAN-specific genes (RPS15, complement factor D, lactotransferrin, and nitric oxide synthase interacting protein) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and confirmation by immunohistochemistry of 2 PVAN-specific proteins with antiviral function (lactotransferrin and IFN-inducible transmembrane 1) was done.

conclusionsIn conclusion, even though PVAN and TCMR kidney allografts share great similarities on gene perturbation, PVAN-specific genes were identified with well-known antiviral properties that provide tools for discerning PVAN and AR as well as attractive targets for rational drug design.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntigens, DifferentiationBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolGraft RejectionHumansInfantKidneyKidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationLactoferrinPolyomavirus InfectionsT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousAntigens, DifferentiationLactoferrinleu-13 antigen

Identifiers

PMID27140517
PMCPMC5235336
OpenAlexW2345629918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.