Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27140309›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2016

In vivo imaging of eribulin-induced reoxygenation in advanced breast cancer patients: a comparison to bevacizumab.

Shigeto Ueda, Toshiaki Saeki, Hideki Takeuchi, Takashi Shigekawa, Tomohiko Yamane, Ichiei Kuji, Akihiko Osaki

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Eribulin improves tumor oxygenation demonstrated byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shigeto UedaDepartment of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Toshiaki SaekiDepartment of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Hideki TakeuchiDepartment of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Takashi ShigekawaDepartment of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Tomohiko YamaneDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Ichiei KujiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Akihiko OsakiDepartment of Breast Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1371-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
Saitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEribulin mesylate (eribulin) is a first-in-class halichondrin B-based microtubule dynamics inhibitor. To compare the anti-angiogenic activity of eribulin to that of bevacizumab, we compared tumour vessel remodelling and reoxygenation between the two agents.

methodsPatients with advanced breast cancer with stage III/IV were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned to receive either eribulin or single-agent bevacizumab. Tissue concentrations of oxyhaemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb), and oxygen saturation (SO2) of breast tumours before and day 7 after the first infusion were repeatedly measured using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI). A pair of blood samples was collected for multiplex biomarker studies.

resultsBaseline DOSI measurement of all 29 patients (eribulin, n=14 and bevacizumab, n=15) revealed significantly higher tumour concentrations of O2Hb and HHb than that in the normal breast tissue. After eribulin treatment, DOSI revealed a significant decrease in HHb concentration and increased SO2 during the observation period. This trend was not observed for bevacizumab. Instead, bevacizumab significantly decreased the concentration of O2Hb. The multiplex biomarker study revealed that both eribulin and bevacizumab decreased plasma concentrations of VEGF and bFGF, but only eribulin treatment suppressed the plasma concentration of TGF-β1.

conclusionsEribulin, but not bevacizumab, treatment increased tumour SO2. Suppression of TGF-β1 by eribulin could have a favourable anti-angiogenic effect. Our results suggest that differences in vascular remodelling between these two agents may account for their different effects on tumour reoxygenation.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2FuransHemodynamicsHemoglobinsHumansKetonesNeoplasm ProteinsOxygenOxyhemoglobinsPaclitaxelAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBevacizumabdeoxyhemoglobineribulinFibroblast Growth Factor 2FuransHemoglobinsKetonesNeoplasm ProteinsOxygenOxyhemoglobinsPaclitaxelPolyether PolyketidesTransforming Growth Factor beta1Tubulin ModulatorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27140309
PMCPMC4891505
OpenAlexW2346198182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.