Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27139603›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2016

Prognostic Value of Soluble ST2 During Hospitalization for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Olga Barbarash, Olga Gruzdeva, Evgenya Uchasova, Yulia Dyleva, Ekaterina Belik, Olga Akbasheva, Victoria Karetnikova, Aleksandr Shilov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. IL-33/IL-31 Axis in Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga BarbarashFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Olga GruzdevaFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Evgenya UchasovaFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation. evg.uchasova@yandex.ru.
Yulia DylevaFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Ekaterina BelikFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Olga AkbashevaState Budget Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education, Siberian State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Health, Tomsk, Russian Federation.
Victoria KaretnikovaFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Aleksandr ShilovFederal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Kemerovo State University · RUSiberian State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudying the role of soluble ST2 (sST2) during hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) can be helpful for predicting the course of the hospitalization and development of complications.

methodsWe included 88 patients with MI (median age, 58 yr). Depending on the course of the hospitalization, the patients were divided into two groups: the favorable (n=58) and unfavorable (n=30) outcome groups. On days 1 and 12 after MI, serum sST2 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured by ELISA.

resultsOn day 1, the concentrations of sST2 and NT-proBNP increased 2.4- and 4.5-fold, compared with the controls. Measurements on day 12 showed a significant decrease in the sST2 level (P=0.001), whereas the NT-proBNP level did not change. On day 1, the sST2 level in the unfavorable outcome group was 2-fold higher than that in the favorable outcome group and 3.7-fold higher than in the controls. On day 12, the marker level decreased in both groups. On day 1, the NT-proBNP level in the unfavorable outcome group was 6.8-fold higher than in the controls and 1.8-fold higher than in the favorable outcome group. On day 12, the level of NT-proBNP remained elevated in both groups. Determining the levels of both sST2 and NT-proBNP increases their diagnostic significance (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2; areas under curve [AUC] 0.89; P=0.004).

conclusionsThe level of sST2 is a more sensitive indicator during MI hospitalization than NT-proBNP.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveCase-Control StudiesElectrocardiographyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainOdds RatioPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Receptors, SomatostatinMyocardial infarctionNT-proBNPsST2

Identifiers

PMID27139603
PMCPMC4855050
OpenAlexW2345169017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.