Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27139468›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Potential Clinical Utility of Fosfomycin and Meropenem in Combination Therapy against KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

James Albiero, Sherwin K B Sy, Josmar Mazucheli, Silvana Martins Caparroz-Assef, Bruno Buranello Costa, Janio Leal Borges Alves, Ana Cristina Gales, Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James AlbieroDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil jamesalbiero1@gmail.com mcbtognim@uem.br.
Sherwin K B SyPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioestatística, Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Josmar MazucheliPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioestatística, Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Silvana Martins Caparroz-AssefDepartmento de Farmacologia e Terapêutica, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Bruno Buranello CostaDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Janio Leal Borges AlvesDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Ana Cristina GalesLaboratório Alerta, Divisão de Doenças Infecciosas, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Cristina Bronharo TognimDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil jamesalbiero1@gmail.com mcbtognim@uem.br.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae causes serious infections associated with high death rates worldwide. Combination therapy consisting of fosfomycin and a carbapenem is better than monotherapy to combat multidrug-resistant microorganisms, but no dosages for the combination have been defined. The MICs of meropenem and fosfomycin were evaluated against 18 clinical isolates of KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae The activities of combination antimicrobials were also determined by the checkerboard method. The MIC50 and MIC90 of each agent alone and in combination were challenged against short (1.5-h) or prolonged (3-h) infusion regimens of meropenem (1 g every 8 h [q8h], 1.5 g q6h, 2 g q8h) and fosfomycin (4 g q8h, 6 g q6h, 8 g q8h) by Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the time above the MIC of the free drug concentration as a percentage of the dosing interval (fT>MIC). The monotherapy MIC50s and MIC90s were 32 and 256 mg/liter for meropenem and 64 and 512 mg/liter for fosfomycin, respectively. Antimicrobial combination increased bacterial susceptibility to 1/4 the MIC50s and to 1/8 to 1/16 the MIC90s of monotherapy. The antimicrobial combination demonstrated a synergistic effect for at least two-thirds of the isolates. In combination therapy, fosfomycin regimens of 6 g q6h and 8 g q8h as a 3-h infusion against the MIC50 and MIC90 had better chances of achieving ≥90% probability of target attainment (PTA) of 70% fT>MIC. Meropenem regimens of 1.5 g q6h and 2 g q8h in prolonged infusion can achieve close to 90% PTA of 40% fT>MIC for MIC50 but not MIC90 The significant reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of appropriate PTA demonstrated that regimens containing fosfomycin with meropenem can be effective against KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFosfomycinKlebsiella pneumoniaeMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFosfomycinMeropenemThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID27139468
PMCPMC4914646
OpenAlexW2346356694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.