Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27139254›Full record

Trial reportTropical animal health and production2016

Effect of treating sugarcane bagasse with urea and calcium hydroxide on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle.

Nirawan Gunun, Metha Wanapat, Pongsatorn Gunun, Anusorn Cherdthong, Pichad Khejornsart, Sungchhang Kang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tropical animal health and production, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of sugarcane bagasse onAnimal biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilization of Mao (Veterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Kimchi cabbage (Journal of animal science and technology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nirawan GununProgram in Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Technology, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani, 41000, Thailand. nirawan_kku@hotmail.com.
Metha WanapatDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Pongsatorn GununDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology-Isan, Sakon Nakhon Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47160, Thailand.
Anusorn CherdthongDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Pichad KhejornsartAgro-Bioresources, Faculty of Natural Resources and AgroIndustry, Kasetsart University, Chalermphakiat Sakon Nakhon Campus, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.
Sungchhang KangAgricultural Unit, Department of Education, National Institute of Education, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Khon Kaen University · THKasetsart University · THRajamangala University of Technology Isan · THUdon Thani Rajabhat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four beef cattle with initial body weight of 283 ± 14 kg were randomly allocated according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design to study on the effect of feeding sugarcane bagasse (SB) treated with urea and/or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation. The treatments were as follows: rice straw (RS), untreated SB (SB), 4 % urea-treated SB (SBU), and 2 % urea + 2 % Ca(OH)2-treated SB (SBUC), respectively. The results revealed that cattle fed with SBU and SBUC had higher feed intake and apparent digestibility. Ammonia nitrogen and blood urea nitrogen were increased in cattle fed with SB as roughage source (P < 0.05). Feeding SBU and SBUC to cattle resulted in higher propionic acid and lower acetic acid, acetic to propionic ratio, and methane production (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of fungi was increased in SBU- and SBUC-fed groups while protozoa population was unchanged. This study concluded that the nutritive value of SB was improved by urea and/or Ca(OH)2 treatment, and feeding treated SB could increase feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation. This study suggested that SB treated with 2 % urea + 2 % Ca(OH)2 could be used as an alternative roughage source for ruminant feeding.

Indexed as

Animal FeedCelluloseSaccharumAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBody CompositionCalcium HydroxideCattleFermentationRed MeatRumenUreabagasseCalcium HydroxideCelluloseUreaCalcium hydroxideDigestibilityRumen fermentationSugarcane bagasseUrea

Identifiers

PMID27139254
OpenAlexW2346685447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.