Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27138947›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016

Social protection spending and inequalities in depressive symptoms across Europe.

Claire L Niedzwiedz, Richard J Mitchell, Niamh K Shortt, Jamie R Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Levelling up: Global examples of reducing health inequalities.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Local Inequalities in Health Behaviours: Longitudinal Findings from the Stockton-On-Tees Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire L NiedzwiedzCentre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, Scotland, UK. claire.niedzwiedz@gmail.com.
Richard J MitchellCentre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland, UK.
Niamh K ShorttCentre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, Scotland, UK.
Jamie R PearceCentre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, Scotland, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 263501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommon mental disorders are an increasing global public health concern. The least advantaged in society experience a greater burden of mental illness, but inequalities in mental health vary by social, political, and economic contexts. This study investigates whether spending on different types of social protection alters the extent of social inequality in depressive symptoms.

methodsData were obtained from the 2006 and 2012 cross-sectional waves of the European Social Survey, which included 48,397 individuals from 18 European countries. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D 8). Statistical interactions between country-level social protection spending and individuals' education level, employment and family status were explored using multilevel regression models.

resultsHigher spending on active labour market programmes was related to narrower inequality in depressive symptoms by education level. Compared to men with high education, the marginal effect of having low education was 1.67 (95 % CI, 1.46-1.87) among men in countries with lower spending and 0.85 (95 % CI, 0.66-1.03) in higher spending countries. Single parents exhibited fewer depressive symptoms, as spending on family policies increased. Little evidence was found for an overall association between spending on unemployment benefits and employment-related inequalities in depressive symptoms, but in 2012, unemployment spending appeared beneficial to mental health among the unemployed.

conclusionsGreater investment in social protection may act to reduce inequalities in depressive symptoms. Reductions in spending levels or increased conditionality may adversely affect the mental health of disadvantaged social groups.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentSocioeconomic FactorsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEmploymentEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisPublic PolicyRegression AnalysisDepressionEmploymentEuropeInequalitySocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID27138947
PMCPMC4947487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.