Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27138929›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2016

Retrospective comparison of sedated and non-sedated colonoscopy in an outpatient practice.

Ali Mothanna Al-Zubaidi, Abdelfattah Abdelqader Al-Shadadi, Hassan Uthman Alghamdy, Abdu Hassan Alzobady, Laeeque Ahmed Al-Qureshi, Ibraheem Mohammed Al-Bakri

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali Mothanna Al-ZubaidiDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia. dr_ali26@yahoo.com.
Abdelfattah Abdelqader Al-ShadadiDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan Uthman AlghamdyDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Abdu Hassan AlzobadyDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Laeeque Ahmed Al-QureshiDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Ibraheem Mohammed Al-BakriDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
King Khaled Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sedation and analgesia for patients undergoing colonoscopy are the standard practice in western countries, non-sedated colonoscopy is still in practice in Europe and the Far East. This variation in sedation practice relies on the different cultural attitudes of both patients and endoscopists across these countries. Data from the literature consistently report that, in non-sedated patients, the use of alternative techniques, such as water irrigation or carbon dioxide insufflation, can allow a high-quality and well-tolerated examination. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected performance improvement in endoscopy unit at King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia. The tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation in terms of patient's ability to return to routine work and drive if necessary on the same day of procedure was evaluated. A total of 538 patients who underwent a colonoscopy at King Khalid Hospital endoscopy unit (Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) were reviewed from September 2011 to November 2013. All of the procedures were performed by two expert endoscopists, assisted by well-trained nursing staff. Insertion of the colonoscope was aided by insufflations of air, and in a few instances, by water through the colonoscope to minimize air insufflations. IV sedatives were administered upon the judgment of the physician when patient was unable to tolerate the procedure. Of 538 patients who underwent a colonoscopy, 79 patients required sedation. Forty-seven during the procedure and 32 requested pre-procedure sedation, most of them below 20 years of age. Thirty-two who requested pre-procedure sedation were excluded from our statistics. Of the remaining 506 cases, 47 (9.3 %) required sedation during procedure while 459 (90.7 %) tolerated the procedure without sedation. This shortened the hospital stay time, improved the ability to return to work much earlier, and undertake daily activities such as driving. It is also cost effective. The approach of non-sedative colonoscopy and use of sedation on-demand with minimal air insufflation or water infusion when needed during the procedure were well tolerated by approximately 91 % of patients at a single center in Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAgedColonoscopyCost-Benefit AnalysisDeep SedationFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesReturn to WorkSaudi ArabiaAnalgesiaColonoscopyEndoscopyNon-sedated colonoscopySedation

Identifiers

PMID27138929
OpenAlexW2343416994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.