Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Nikhil V DhurandharFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX (NVD); the Nutrition Obesity Research Center (DBA, e-mail: dallison@uab.edu) and Office of Energetics (AWB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ (DT).
Andrew W BrownFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX (NVD); the Nutrition Obesity Research Center (DBA, e-mail: dallison@uab.edu) and Office of Energetics (AWB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ (DT).ORCID 0000-0002-1758-8205
Diana ThomasFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX (NVD); the Nutrition Obesity Research Center (DBA, e-mail: dallison@uab.edu) and Office of Energetics (AWB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ (DT).ORCID 0000-0003-2641-9304
David B AllisonFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX (NVD); the Nutrition Obesity Research Center (DBA, e-mail: dallison@uab.edu) and Office of Energetics (AWB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ (DT).ORCID 0000-0003-3566-9399
Energy Balance Measurement Working Group
Funding
University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
UAB Obesity Training ProgramT32DK062710 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill, Brooks C Wingo · 2004 to 2026
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
We Agree That Self-Reported Energy Intake Should Not Be Used as a Basis for Conclusions about Energy Intake in Scientific Research. · full record | OpenQuestion