ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2016
Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- A new approach: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with priority access to small bowel mesentery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Current status and trend of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Review
- Recurrence and Long-Term Survival Following Segmental Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer in 813 Patients: a Single-Institution Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Article
- The use of intra-abdominal drain in minimally invasive right colectomy: a propensity score matched analysis on postoperative outcomes.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer-has the control group so far been chosen correctly?World journal of surgical oncology · 2018Article
- Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.Surgery today · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopy for colorectal cancer resection bares early post-operative advantages and results in equal oncologic long-term outcome. However, data on laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy is scarce. Aim of the present study was to analyze a well selected collective of patients with right-sided colon cancer treated open and laparoscopically with regard to peri-operative and long-term outcome.
methodsWe analyzed all patients who underwent right-sided hemi-colectomy for colon cancer between January 1996 and March 2013. Data was extracted from our prospective database. Inclusion criteria were tumor localization in the ascending colon, oncologic resection, histology of an adenocarcinoma, tumors UICC I-III, and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were multiple malignancies including colon, emergency operation, adenoma or pT0 status, and UICC IV. For the matched pairs approach between patients undergoing laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery, the parameters age, UICC stage, tumor grading, and sex were applied.
resultsA total of 188 patients was included in the analysis with n = 94 in both the LAP and the OPEN group. Some peri-operative results demonstrated advantages for laparoscopy including median return to liquid (p < 0.0001) and solid diet (p = 0.008), median length of ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and median length of hospital stay (p = 0.022). No significant differences were revealed for complication rates, rates of anastomotic leakage, or 30-day mortality. Lymph node yield was identical. Also, no differences in oncologic long-term outcome were detected. Rates for local recurrence were 4.3 and 2.0 %.
conclusionThis matched pairs analysis verifies peri-operative advantages of laparoscopy explicitly for the sub-group of CRC patients undergoing right-sided hemi-colectomy in comparison to open surgery while demonstrating equivalent oncologic long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27138640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.