Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27138209›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Inter-site and inter-scanner diffusion MRI data harmonization.

H Mirzaalian, L Ning, P Savadjiev, O Pasternak, S Bouix, O Michailovich, G Grant, C E Marx, R A Morey, L A Flashman and 12 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Whole-brain white matter variation across childhood environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. DDEvENet: Evidence-based ensemble learning for uncertainty-aware brain parcellation using diffusion MRI.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

H MirzaalianHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. Electronic address: hengameh.mirzaalian@gmail.com.
L NingHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
P SavadjievHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
O PasternakHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
S BouixHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
O MichailovichUniversity of Waterloo, Canada.
G GrantStanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA (Previously Duke University).
C E MarxDuke University Medical Center and VA Mid-Atlantic MIRECC, NC, USA.
R A MoreyDuke University Medical Center and VA Mid-Atlantic MIRECC, NC, USA.
L A FlashmanDartmouth University, Hanover and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
M S GeorgeMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston.
T W McAllisterGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (original) and Indiana University School of Medicine (current).
N AndaluzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati (UC) College of Medicine; Neurotrauma Center at UC Neuroscience Institute; and Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, OH.
L ShutterUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (Previously Duke University).
R CoimbraDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Diego.
R D ZafonteSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
M J ColemanHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
M KubickiHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
C F WestinHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
M B SteinUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
M E ShentonHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Y RathiHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Novel DT-MRI Analyses of White Matter in SchizophreniaR01MH074794 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2007 to 2021
$9.6M
Taking advanced diffusion imaging to the clinic for pediatric patients with ADHDR01MH097979 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI RATHI, YOGESH · 2012 to 2017
$2.4M
CRCNS:Subject-Specific Difusion MRI Profiles of Injury in TBI and PTSDR01HD090641 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BOUIX, SYLVAIN · 2016 to 2018
$810k
A Fast Proteometric Synapse Census PlatformR21MH099797 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, STEPHEN J · 2012 to 2013
$406k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090641NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074794NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097979NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH099797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a novel method to harmonize diffusion MRI data acquired from multiple sites and scanners, which is imperative for joint analysis of the data to significantly increase sample size and statistical power of neuroimaging studies. Our method incorporates the following main novelties: i) we take into account the scanner-dependent spatial variability of the diffusion signal in different parts of the brain; ii) our method is independent of compartmental modeling of diffusion (e.g., tensor, and intra/extra cellular compartments) and the acquired signal itself is corrected for scanner related differences; and iii) inter-subject variability as measured by the coefficient of variation is maintained at each site. We represent the signal in a basis of spherical harmonics and compute several rotation invariant spherical harmonic features to estimate a region and tissue specific linear mapping between the signal from different sites (and scanners). We validate our method on diffusion data acquired from seven different sites (including two GE, three Philips, and two Siemens scanners) on a group of age-matched healthy subjects. Since the extracted rotation invariant spherical harmonic features depend on the accuracy of the brain parcellation provided by Freesurfer, we propose a feature based refinement of the original parcellation such that it better characterizes the anatomy and provides robust linear mappings to harmonize the dMRI data. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method by statistically comparing diffusion measures such as fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and generalized fractional anisotropy across multiple sites before and after data harmonization. We also show results using tract-based spatial statistics before and after harmonization for independent validation of the proposed methodology. Our experimental results demonstrate that, for nearly identical acquisition protocol across sites, scanner-specific differences can be accurately removed using the proposed method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySubtraction TechniqueDiffusion MRIHarmonizationInter-scannerIntra-siteMulti-site

Identifiers

PMID27138209
PMCPMC5367052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.