Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27138087›Full record

ReviewMechanisms of ageing and development2016

Dynamics of biomarkers in relation to aging and mortality.

Konstantin G Arbeev, Svetlana V Ukraintseva, Anatoliy I Yashin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mechanisms of ageing and development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Allostatic load in the context of disasters.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association of Blood Chemistry Quantifications of Biological Aging With Disability and Mortality in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konstantin G ArbeevBiodemography of Aging Research Unit (BARU), Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 2024 W. Main St., Room A102F, Box 90420, Durham, NC 27705, USA. Electronic address: ka29@duke.edu.
Svetlana V UkraintsevaBiodemography of Aging Research Unit (BARU), Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 2024 W. Main St., Room A102F, Box 90420, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Anatoliy I YashinBiodemography of Aging Research Unit (BARU), Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 2024 W. Main St., Room A102F, Box 90420, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Funding

STALLARD Admin Supp: Predicting Future Care Needs and Costs for Individual Medicare Enrollees with Incident Suspected Alzheimer's DiseaseP30AG034424 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT M. LYNCH · 2009 to 2026
$12.2M
Relationships among Genetic Regulators of Aging Health and LifespanP01AG043352 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2014 to 2018
$8.7M
Genetics of changes in population pyramids: Implications for health forecasting with a focus on Alzheimer's Disease and related dementiasRF1AG046860 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2019 to 2019
$3.1M
YASHIN Admin Supp: Time Trends in Alzheimer's Disease: Addressing the Changing Role of Risk Factors and Instrument ValidityR01AG046860 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043352NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034424NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046860NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG046860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary longitudinal studies collect repeated measurements of biomarkers allowing one to analyze their dynamics in relation to mortality, morbidity, or other health-related outcomes. Rich and diverse data collected in such studies provide opportunities to investigate how various socio-economic, demographic, behavioral and other variables can interact with biological and genetic factors to produce differential rates of aging in individuals. In this paper, we review some recent publications investigating dynamics of biomarkers in relation to mortality, which use single biomarkers as well as cumulative measures combining information from multiple biomarkers. We also discuss the analytical approach, the stochastic process models, which conceptualizes several aging-related mechanisms in the structure of the model and allows evaluating "hidden" characteristics of aging-related changes indirectly from available longitudinal data on biomarkers and follow-up on mortality or onset of diseases taking into account other relevant factors (both genetic and non-genetic). We also discuss an extension of the approach, which considers ranges of "optimal values" of biomarkers rather than a single optimal value as in the original model. We discuss practical applications of the approach to single biomarkers and cumulative measures highlighting that the potential of applications to cumulative measures is still largely underused.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMortalityAgingAnimalsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersAgingBiomarkerDynamicsLongitudinal dataMortalityRisk factorStochastic process model

Identifiers

PMID27138087
PMCPMC4899173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.