Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27138020›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

J C Lauscher, V Schneider, L D Lee, A Stroux, H J Buhr, M E Kreis, J P Ritz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J C LauscherDepartment of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany. johannes.lauscher@charite.de.
V SchneiderDepartment of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
L D LeeDepartment of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
A StrouxInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
H J BuhrGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery, Schiffbauerdamm 40, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
M E KreisDepartment of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
J P RitzDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, HELIOS Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393-397, 19049, Schwerin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData regarding length of hospital stay of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal are very heterogeneous. There are many factors that may have an influence on the length of postoperative hospital stay, such as postoperative wound infections. One potential strategy to reduce their incidence and to decrease hospital stay is to insert subcutaneous suction drains. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the insertion of subcutaneous suction drains on hospital stay and postoperative wound infections in ileostomy reversal. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were determined.

methodsThis is a randomized controlled two-center non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups. The total length of hospital stay as primary endpoint and the occurrence of a surgical site infection, the colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, and the occurrence of hematomas/seromas as secondary endpoints were monitored.

resultsOne hundred eighteen patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included. Fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to insertion of a subcutaneous suction drain, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to receive no drain. After 3 months of follow-up, 50 patients in the group with drain and 53 patients in the group without drain could be analyzed. Median total length of hospital stay was 8 days in the SD group and 9 days in the group without SD (p = 0.17). Fourteen percent of patients with SD and 17 % without SD developed SSI, p = 0.68. Multivariate analysis revealed anemia (p < 0.01), intraoperative bowel perforation (p = 0.02) and resident (p = 0.04) or fellow (p = 0.048) performing the operation as risk factors for SSI.

conclusionsThis trial shows that the omission of subcutaneous suction drains is not inferior to the use of subcutaneous suction drains after ileostomy reversal in terms of length of hospital stay, surgical site infections, and hematomas/seromas.

Indexed as

IleostomyAdultAgedDrainageFemaleHumansIntestinal DiseasesLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeReoperationRisk FactorsSuctionSurgical Wound InfectionHospital stayIleostomy closureSubcutaneous suction drainsSurgical site infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.