Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27137926›Full record

Trial reportNeuroradiology2016

GREAT-a randomized controlled trial comparing HydroSoft/HydroFrame and bare platinum coils for endovascular aneurysm treatment: procedural safety and core-lab-assessedangiographic results.

Christian A Taschner, René Chapot, Vincent Costalat, Paolo Machi, Patrick Courthéoux, Xavier Barreau, Jérôme Berge, Laurent Pierot, Kryzsztof Kadziolka, Betty Jean and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison between second generation HydroSoft coils and bare platinum coils for the treatment of large intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A call for neurologists to take up stroke intervention.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Safety/Efficacy of a Pusher, Thermal Detachment Coil for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Christian A TaschnerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. christian.taschner@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
René ChapotDepartment of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Krankenhaus Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Vincent CostalatDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Paolo MachiDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Patrick CourthéouxDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
Xavier BarreauDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jérôme BergeDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Laurent PierotDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Kryzsztof KadziolkaDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Betty JeanDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Raphaël BlancDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.
Alessandra BiondiDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
Hervé BrunelDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hôpital La Timone, CHU Marseille, Marseille, France.
Sophie GallasDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
Ansgar BerlisDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Augsburg Hospital, Augsburg, Germany.
Denis HerbreteauDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
Joachim BerkefeldInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Horst UrbachDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Samer El ShikhDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hubert DesalDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hôpital G et R Laënnec, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Erika GrafClinical Trials Unit, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alain BonaféDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHybrid hydrogel-platinum coils (HydroCoil) have proven effective for endovascular aneurysm treatment. To overcome technical limitations (coil stiffness, time restriction for placement), a second generation of softer hydrogel coils has been brought to clinical practice (HydroSoft, HydroFrame). We report on procedural safety and core-lab-assessed angiographic results from an open-label multicenter randomized controlled trial.

methodsWeb-based randomization occurred in 15 medical centers in France and seven in Germany between coil embolization with second-generation hydrogel coils and treatment with any bare platinum coil. Assist devices could be used as clinically required. Primary endpoint is a composite outcome including major aneurysm recurrence and poor clinical outcome at 18 months follow-up.

resultsFive hundred thirteen patients were randomized (hydrogel n = 256, bare platinum n = 257). Twenty patients were excluded for missing informed consent and nine patients for treatment related criteria. Four hundred eighty-four patients were analyzed as randomized (hydrogel n = 243, bare platinum n = 241). Two hundred eight had ruptured aneurysms (43 %). Prespecified procedural complications occurred in 58 subjects (hydrogel n = 28, bare platinum n = 30, p = 0.77). The 14-day mortality rate was 2.1 % in both arms of the study. The median calculated packing densities for aneurysms assigned to hydrogel and bare platinum were 39 and 31 % respectively (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between arms in the post procedural angiographic occlusion rate (p = 0.8).

conclusionSecond-generation hydrogel coils can be used in a wide spectrum of aneurysms with a risk profile equivalent to bare platinum. Packing density was significantly higher in aneurysms treated with hydrogel coils.

trial registrationhttp://www.germanctr.de , DRKS00003132.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral AngiographyEndovascular ProceduresEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleFranceGermanyHumansHydrogelsIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPlatinumHydrogelsPlatinumHydrogel coilsIntracranial aneurysmRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.