ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2016
New markers of dietary added sugar intake.
Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Urinary Excretion of Sodium, Nitrogen, and Sugar Amounts Are Valid Biomarkers of Dietary Sodium, Protein, and High Sugar Intake in Nonobese Adolescents.The Journal of nutrition · 2017Trial
- Identifying sources of variation in added sugar intake for Alaska Native children using a hair biomarker.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024Article
- The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Capturing Free Sugars Intake in Australian Young Children: The InFANT FFQ.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Collection of biospecimens from parent-child dyads in a community garden-based nutrition intervention: protocol and feasibility.BMC nutrition · 2022Article
- Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Dietary Fatty Acids, Macronutrient Substitutions, Food Sources and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease: Findings From the EPIC-CVD Case-Cohort Study Across Nine European Countries.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Observational
- Article
- Assessing Interactions betweenInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Objective Biomarkers for Total Added Sugar Intake - Are We on a Wild Goose Chase?Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Age and time trends in sugar intake among children and adolescents: results from the DONALD study.European journal of nutrition · 2020Article
- Article
- Short-term changes in added sugar consumption by adolescents reflected in the carbon isotope ratio of fingerstick blood.Nutrition and health · 2018Article
- Compound-specific isotope analysis resolves the dietary origin of docosahexaenoic acid in the mouse brain.Journal of lipid research · 2017Article
- A review of total & added sugar intakes and dietary sources in Europe.Nutrition journal · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdded sugar consumption is associated with adverse health outcomes, including weight gain and cardio-metabolic disease, yet the reliance on self-reported methods to determine added sugar intake continues to be a significant research limitation. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in the development of two potential predictive biomarkers of added sugar intake: δC and urinary sugar excretion. RECENT
findingsThe results of numerous cross-sectional investigations have indicated modest associations of the δC sugar biomarker measured in a variety of sample types (e.g., fingerstick blood, serum, red blood cells, and hair) with self-reported added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverage intake, and δC values have been reported to change over time with changes in reported sugar-sweetened beverage intake. Results from large-scale trials have suggested modest associations of urinary sugar excretion with reported sugar intake, and a dose-response relation has been demonstrated between urinary sugar excretion and actual sugar intake. SUMMARY: Valid markers of sugar intake are urgently needed to more definitively determine the health consequences of added sugar intake. Adequately powered controlled feeding studies are needed to validate and compare these two biomarkers of sugar intake, and to determine what individual characteristics and conditions impact biomarker results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.