Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27137373›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2013

Endocytic Pathways and Recycling in Growing Pollen Tubes.

Elisabetta Onelli, Alessandra Moscatelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Compounds composition of pollen tubes of Scots pine (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mechanics of Pollen Tube Elongation: A Perspective.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabetta OnelliDipartimento di Bioscienze, Universita' degli Studi di Milano Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy. elisabetta.onelli@unimi.it.
Alessandra MoscatelliDipartimento di Bioscienze, Universita' degli Studi di Milano Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy. alessandra.moscatelli@unimi.it.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollen tube growth is based on transport of secretory vesicles into the apical region where they fuse with a small area of the plasma membrane. The amount of secretion greatly exceeds the quantity of membrane required for growth. Mechanisms of membrane retrieval have recently been demonstrated and partially characterized using FM (Fei Mao) dyes or charged nanogold. Both these probes reveal that clathrin-dependent and -independent endocytosis occur in pollen tubes and are involved in distinct degradation pathways and membrane recycling. Exocytosis, internalization and sorting of PM proteins/lipids depend on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton and are involved in actin filament organization. However, some kinds of endocytic and exocytic processes occurring in the central area of the tip still need to be characterized. Analysis of secretion dynamics and data derived from endocytosis highlight the complexity of events occurring in the tip region and suggest a new model of pollen tube growth.

Indexed as

actin cytoskeletonclathrin-dependent endocytosisclathrin-independent endocytosisexocytosismembrane recyclingpolarized growthpollen tube

Identifiers

PMID27137373
PMCPMC4844360
OpenAlexW1975046175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.