ArticleMolecular pharmacology2016
Structure-Activity Analysis of Biased Agonism at the Human Adenosine A3 Receptor.
Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-based discovery of positive allosteric modulators of the AProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- New paradigms in purinergic receptor ligand discovery.Neuropharmacology · 2023Review
- International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CXII: Adenosine Receptors: A Further Update.Pharmacological reviews · 2022Review
- Molecular Simulations and Drug Discovery of Adenosine Receptors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 2‑Cl‑IB‑MECA regulates the proliferative and drug resistance pathways, and facilitates chemosensitivity in pancreatic and liver cancer cell lines.International journal of molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Purinergic Signaling: Impact of GPCR Structures on Rational Drug Design.ChemMedChem · 2020Review
- Assessment of biased agonism at the ABiochemical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Functional Expression of Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Ability of CP-532,903 to protect mouse hearts from ischemia/reperfusion injury is dependent on expression of ABiochemical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Probing structure-activity relationship in β-arrestin2 recruitment of diversely substituted adenosine derivatives.Biochemical pharmacology · 2018Article
- New paradigms in adenosine receptor pharmacology: allostery, oligomerization and biased agonism.British journal of pharmacology · 2018Review
- Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018Review
- AMedicinal research reviews · 2018Review
- Biased signalling: from simple switches to allosteric microprocessors.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2018Review
- Breakthrough in GPCR Crystallography and Its Impact on Computer-Aided Drug Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018Article
- Mu-Opioid receptor biased ligands: A safer and painless discovery of analgesics?Drug discovery today · 2017Review
- A kinetic view of GPCR allostery and biased agonism.Nature chemical biology · 2017Article
- Design and validation of the first cell-impermeant melatonin receptor agonist.British journal of pharmacology · 2017Article
- Structural Probing and Molecular Modeling of the A₃ Adenosine Receptor: A Focus on Agonist Binding.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Human Adenosine AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has significant implications for current drug discovery, but molecular determinants that govern ligand bias remain largely unknown. The adenosine A3 GPCR (A3AR) is a potential therapeutic target for various conditions, including cancer, inflammation, and ischemia, but for which biased agonism remains largely unexplored. We now report the generation of bias "fingerprints" for prototypical ribose containing A3AR agonists and rigidified (N)-methanocarba 5'-N-methyluronamide nucleoside derivatives with regard to their ability to mediate different signaling pathways. Relative to the reference prototypical agonist IB-MECA, (N)-methanocarba 5'-N-methyluronamide nucleoside derivatives with significant N(6) or C2 modifications, including elongated aryl-ethynyl groups, exhibited biased agonism. Significant positive correlation was observed between the C2 substituent length (in Å) and bias toward cell survival. Molecular modeling suggests that extended C2 substituents on (N)-methanocarba 5'-N-methyluronamide nucleosides promote a progressive outward shift of the A3AR transmembrane domain 2, which may contribute to the subset of A3AR conformations stabilized on biased agonist binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.