Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27136938›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2016

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: Perspectives on CAR T Cells and Other Cellular Therapies for Hematologic Malignancies.

Saar Gill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saar GillDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. saar.gill@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)K08CA194256 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GILL, SAAR · 2015 to 2019
$839k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA194256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematologic oncologists now have at their disposal (or a referral away) a myriad of new options to get from point A (a patient with relapsed or poor-risk disease) to point B (potential tumor eradication and long-term disease-free survival). In this perspective piece, we discuss the putative mechanisms of action and the relative strengths and weaknesses of currently available cellular therapy approaches. Notably, while many of these approaches have been published in high impact journals, with the exception of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and of checkpoint inhibitors (PD1/PDL1 or CTLA4 blockade), the published clinical trials have mostly been early phase, uncontrolled studies. Therefore, many of the new cellular therapy approaches have yet to demonstrate incontrovertible evidence of enhanced overall survival compared with controls. Nonetheless, the science behind these is sure to advance our understanding of cancer immunology and ultimately to bring us closer to our goal of curing cancer.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalProtein Kinase InhibitorsT-LymphocytesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationAlloreactivityChimeric antigen receptorsNatural killer cellsT cell receptor transgenic T cellsTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID27136938
PMCPMC5018307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.