ReviewInsights into imaging2016
Advanced imaging of colorectal cancer: From anatomy to molecular imaging.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of [World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and 18- FDG PET/CT in response assessment in rectosigmoid carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Advances in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: the application of molecular biomarkers and imaging techniques: a literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Medical Imaging Segmentation with GB-SAM: A Novel Approach to Tissue Segmentation Using Granular Box Prompts.Cancers · 2024Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in risk prediction, prognostication, and therapy response assessment in colorectal cancer: current state and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies.La Radiologia medica · 2020Review
- Review
- Noninvasive assessment and therapeutic monitoring of drug-resistant colorectal cancer by MR molecular imaging of extradomain-B fibronectin.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Colorectal cancer: Parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- A guide to multimodal endoscopy imaging for gastrointestinal malignancy - an early indicator.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- Molecular endoscopic imaging: the future is bright.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledImaging techniques play a key role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. The introduction of new advanced anatomical, functional, and molecular imaging techniques may improve the assessment of diagnosis, prognosis, planning therapy, and assessment of response to treatment of these patients. Functional and molecular imaging techniques in clinical practice may allow the assessment of tumour-specific characteristics and tumour heterogeneity. This paper will review recent developments in imaging technologies and the evolving roles for these techniques in colorectal cancer. TEACHING POINTS: • Imaging techniques play a key role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. • Advanced imaging techniques improve the evaluation of these patients. • Functional and molecular imaging allows assessment of tumour hallmarks and tumour heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.