Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27136577›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Association of Polymorphisms in the Atrial Natriuretic Factor Gene with the Risk of Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jinyao Wang, Zhenkun Wang, Chuanhua Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Genetic Polymorphisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genetic disruption ofAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinyao WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan 430071, China. jinjinyao456@163.com.
Zhenkun WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan 430071, China. wongzhenkun@gmail.com.
Chuanhua YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan 430071, China. yuchua@163.com.
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies evaluating the association between the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) genetic polymorphism and the risk of essential hypertension (EH) have reported inconsistent results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide a more reliable estimation of the possible relationship between the atrial natriuretic peptide genetic polymorphism and the risk of essential hypertension (EH).

methodsRelevant articles were searched to identify all case-control or cohort design studies of the associations between ANP polymorphism and EH. The heterogeneity was checked using the Q test and the inconsistent index (I²). The odds ratio (OR) test and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in a fixed or random effects model to evaluate the strength of association. Begg's test and Egger's test were applied to evaluate the publication bias.

resultsA total of 25 case-control studies including 5520 cases and 5210 controls exploring the association between ANP polymorphism and EH were available for this meta-analysis. No significant association between the T2238C polymorphism and overall EH risk under the five genetic models was found (C vs. T: OR = 1.1, 95%CI = 0.94-1.2, p = 0.38; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.1, 95%CI = 0.88-1.5, p = 0.32; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.3, 95%CI = 0.90-1.9, p = 0.16; (CC + TC) vs. TT: OR = 1.1, 95%CI = 0.88-1.4, p = 0.35; CC vs. (TT + TC): OR = 1.1, 95%CI = 0.83-1.4, p = 0.55). We also found that the G1837A polymorphism had no significant association with overall EH risk (A vs. G: OR = 1.3, 95%CI = 0.96-1.9, p = 0.090; GA vs. GG: OR = 1.5, 95%CI = 0.83-2.6, p = 0.19; AA vs. GG: OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.34-2.3, p = 0.78; (AA + GA) vs. GG: OR = 1.5, 95%CI = 0.86-2.5, p = 0.17; AA vs. (GG + GA): OR = 1.3, 95%CI = 0.85-2.0, p = 0.22). In the analysis of the T1766C polymorphism, after removing the study of Nkeh, the 1766C allele suggested a protective effect in the model of TC vs. TT (OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.47-0.86, p = 0.003) and (CC + TC) vs. TT (OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.48-0.87, p = 0.004).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested that no significant relationships between ANP T2238C, G1837A gene polymorphisms and the risk of essential hypertension exist. Conversely, the ANP T1766C gene polymorphism may be associated with the risk of essential hypertension, and the 1766C allele may be a protective factor against EH. However, due to the number of limited articles on the T1766C polymorphisms, further studies are still needed to accurately prove the association between the T1766C gene polymorphism and the risk of essential hypertension.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAllelesAtrial Natriuretic FactorCase-Control StudiesHumansHypertensionOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsAtrial Natriuretic FactorANPessential hypertensionmeta-analysispolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID27136577
PMCPMC4881083
OpenAlexW2342560836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.