Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27136533›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

The Dark Side of Cell Fusion.

Daniel Bastida-Ruiz, Kylie Van Hoesen, Marie Cohen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Implications of Heterotypic Cell Fusion in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Genetic Diversity in theBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Mechanisms of Cell Fusion in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Bastida-RuizDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, ‎Geneva 1211, Switzerland. daniel.bastida@etu.unige.ch.
Kylie Van HoesenDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, ‎Geneva 1211, Switzerland. kylie.vanhoesen@gmail.com.
Marie CohenDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, ‎Geneva 1211, Switzerland. marie.cohen@hcuge.ch.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fusion is a physiological cellular process essential for fertilization, viral entry, muscle differentiation and placental development, among others. In this review, we will highlight the different cancer cell-cell fusions and the advantages obtained by these fusions. We will specially focus on the acquisition of metastatic features by cancer cells after fusion with bone marrow-derived cells. The mechanism by which cancer cells fuse with other cells has been poorly studied thus far, but the presence in several cancer cells of syncytin, a trophoblastic fusogen, leads us to a cancer cell fusion mechanism similar to the one used by the trophoblasts. The mechanism by which cancer cells perform the cell fusion could be an interesting target for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow CellsCell FusionGene Products, envHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeoplastic Stem CellsPregnancy ProteinsTrophoblastsGene Products, envPregnancy Proteinssyncytincancercell fusiondrug resistancemetastasissyncytin

Identifiers

PMID27136533
PMCPMC4881464
OpenAlexW2343413265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.