Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27136521›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability-A Review.

Pravin Vejan, Rosazlin Abdullah, Tumirah Khadiran, Salmah Ismail, Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 329 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
329citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

329 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic exploration ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi andPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

269 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pravin VejanInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pravin92@siswa.um.edu.my.
Rosazlin AbdullahInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. rosazlin@um.edu.my.
Tumirah KhadiranForest Product Divisions, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia. tumirah@frim.gov.my.
Salmah IsmailInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. salmah_r@um.edu.my.
Amru Nasrulhaq BoyceInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. amru@um.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) shows an important role in the sustainable agriculture industry. The increasing demand for crop production with a significant reduction of synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides use is a big challenge nowadays. The use of PGPR has been proven to be an environmentally sound way of increasing crop yields by facilitating plant growth through either a direct or indirect mechanism. The mechanisms of PGPR include regulating hormonal and nutritional balance, inducing resistance against plant pathogens, and solubilizing nutrients for easy uptake by plants. In addition, PGPR show synergistic and antagonistic interactions with microorganisms within the rhizosphere and beyond in bulk soil, which indirectly boosts plant growth rate. There are many bacteria species that act as PGPR, described in the literature as successful for improving plant growth. However, there is a gap between the mode of action (mechanism) of the PGPR for plant growth and the role of the PGPR as biofertilizer-thus the importance of nano-encapsulation technology in improving the efficacy of PGPR. Hence, this review bridges the gap mentioned and summarizes the mechanism of PGPR as a biofertilizer for agricultural sustainability.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaPlant DevelopmentRhizosphereAgriculturePlant RootsSoil Microbiologybiofertilizernano-encapsulation technologyplant growthplant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)plant-microbes

Identifiers

PMID27136521
PMCPMC6273255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.