Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27136495›Full record

ArticlePsychosomatic medicine2016

Depression and Anxiety Screens as Predictors of 8-Year Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Primary Care Patients.

Jesse C Stewart, Misty A W Hawkins, Tasneem Khambaty, Anthony J Perkins, Christopher M Callahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosomatic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesse C StewartFrom the Department of Psychology (Stewart), Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Psychology (Hawkins), Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma; Department of Psychology (Khambaty), University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; Indiana University Center for Aging Research (Perkins, Callahan) and Department of Medicine (Callahan), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Regenstrief Institute (Callahan), Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Misty A W Hawkins
Tasneem Khambaty
Anthony J Perkins
Christopher M Callahan

Funding

BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007426 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI PENEDO, FRANK J · 1985 to 2023
$7.1M
Patient-Oriented Research to Improve Geriatric Care-K24K24AG024078 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$1.4M
MODELING ALZHEIMER DISEASE COSTS AND TRANSITIONSR01AG031222 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007426NIA NIH HHS K24 AG024078NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBecause depression and anxiety are typically studied in isolation, our purpose was to examine the relative importance of these overlapping emotional factors in predicting incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsWe examined depression and anxiety screens, and their individual items, as predictors of incident hard CVD events, myocardial infarction, and stroke for 8 years in a diverse sample of 2041 older primary care patients initially free of CVD. At baseline, participants completed self-report depression and anxiety screens. Data regarding CVD events were obtained from an electronic medical record system and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services analytic files.

resultsDuring follow-up, 683 (33%) experienced a CVD event. Cox proportional hazards models-adjusted for demographic and CVD risk factors-revealed that a positive anxiety screen, but not a positive depression screen, was associated with an increased risk of a hard CVD event in separate models (Years 0-3: anxiety hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21-1.96, p < .001; Years 3+: anxiety HR = 0.99, CI = 0.81-1.21), p = .93; depression HR = 1.10, CI = 0.88-1.36, p = .41), as well as when entered into the same model (Years 0-3: anxiety HR = 1.53, CI = 1.20-1.95, p < .001; Years 3+: anxiety HR = 0.99, CI = 0.80-1.21, p = .99; depression HR = 1.03, CI = 0.82-1.29, p = .82). Analyses examining individual items and secondary outcomes showed that the anxiety-CVD association was largely driven by the feeling anxious item and the myocardial infarction outcome.

conclusionsAnxiety, especially feeling anxious, is a unique risk factor for CVD events in older adults, independent of conventional risk factors and depression. Anxiety deserves increased attention as a potential factor relevant to CVD risk stratification and a potential target of CVD primary prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMyocardial InfarctionPrimary Health CarePrognosisRegistriesRiskStroke

Identifiers

PMID27136495
PMCPMC4891255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.