Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27135736›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Akihiko Saitoh, Yuta Aizawa

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Vaccine of the future].Revue francophone des laboratoires : RFL · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akihiko Saitoha Department of Pediatrics , Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences , Niigata , Japan.
Yuta Aizawaa Department of Pediatrics , Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences , Niigata , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intradermal (ID) vaccination induces a more potent immune response and requires lower vaccine doses as compared with standard vaccination routes. To deliver ID vaccines effectively and consistently, an ID delivery device has been developed and is commercially available for adults. The clinical application of ID vaccines for infants and children is much anticipated because children receive several vaccines, on multiple occasions, during infancy and childhood. However, experience with ID vaccines is limited and present evidence is sparse and inconsistent. ID delivery devices are not currently available for infants and children, but recent studies have examined skin thickness in this population and reported that it did not differ in proportion to body size in infants, children, and adults. These results are helpful in developing new ID devices and for preparing new vaccines in infants and children.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment and SuppliesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjections, IntradermalVaccinationchilddeviceinfantintradermal vaccinationintramuscular vaccinationneedle lengthskin thicknesssubcutaneous vaccinationultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID27135736
PMCPMC5027705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.